IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week

Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Thu, 06 December 2007 08:09 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Bni-0006s5-RY; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 03:09:42 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Bnh-0006rt-4V for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 03:09:41 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Bne-0006rP-JD for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 03:09:39 -0500
Received: from scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.251.194]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0BnW-0000rG-A1 for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 03:09:38 -0500
Received: from scmse1.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse1 [133.2.253.16]) by scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id lB689T1K025525 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:09:29 +0900 (JST)
Received: from (133.2.206.133) by scmse1.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp via smtp id 19ef_915df72e_a3d2_11dc_9e3d_0014221fa3c9; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:09:28 +0900
X-AuthUser: duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received: from Tanzawa.it.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.210.1]:36013) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S239763> for <ltru@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:05:30 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20071206162427.0c17f560@localhost>
X-Sender: duerst@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:27:42 +0900
To: Doug Ewell <dewell@roadrunner.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week
In-Reply-To: <004001c836fe$b495d310$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81>
References: <E1IzkOt-0006Yt-T7@megatron.ietf.org> <001101c836f9$261ed2d0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81> <30b660a20712042051s28df0f50ib44c8beca615c5cc@mail.gmail.com> <47562F67.6060905@yahoo-inc.com> <004001c836fe$b495d310$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

At 14:21 07/12/05, Doug Ewell wrote:
>Addison Phillips <addison at yahoo dash inc dot com> wrote:
>
>> There is already a note in 4646bis about Macrolanguage. Perhaps take a look at it and comment directly on the text?
>
>I assume this means the three paragraphs near the bottom of Section 4.1. I think this text is really the best we can do to capture the intent of the WG.  Anything more specific will raise more questions than it answers.
>
>I'm opposed to spending time on a revision of RFC 4647, since we expect everyone to ignore it anyway and stick with remove-from-right.

A really cheap way out would be to put the necessary language in
RFC 4646bis, and leave RFC 4647 alone. Just an idea, probably not
a very good one, it depends on the exact text that's needed.

Regards,    Martin.



#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email