Re: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?

<chair hat on>
I think there is (at least) rough consensus that we do not want
to completely remove the extlang production from the ABNF in
RFC 4646bis. (I only see Frank cleary opposing this, everybody
else is either for it or is okay with it.)

At 08:14 07/12/06, Addison Phillips wrote:
>Would making the ABNF read like the following be adequate:
>
>...
>
>language      = (2*3ALPHA [ extlang ]) ; shortest ISO 639 code
>               / 4ALPHA                 ; reserved for future use
>               / 5*8ALPHA               ; registered language subtag
>
>extlang       = *3("-" 3ALPHA)         ; OBSOLETE (do not use)

<chair hat off>
I would be okay with this, with some explaining text.

Regards,    Martin.

#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru