Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin

Addison wrote:

> <t>Applications MAY use the macrolanguage subtag to form the
> tag instead of using the more specific encompassed language
> subtag. For example, an application with large quantities of
> textual data already using tags with the 'zh' (Chinese)
> subtag might continue to use this more general subtag even
> for new data, even though the content could be more precisely
> be tagged with 'cmn' (Mandarin). Similarly, an application
> already using tags that start with the 'ar' (Arabic) subtag
> might continue to use this more general subtag even for new
> data, which could be more precisely be tagged with 'arb'
> (Standard Arabic).</t></section>

I would suggest the following changes:

 <t>Applications MAY use the macrolanguage subtag to form the
 tag instead of using the more specific encompassed language
 subtag. For example, an application with large quantities of
 textual data already using tags with the 'zh' (Chinese)
 subtag might continue to use this more general subtag even
 for new data, even though the content could be more precisely
 be tagged with 'cmn' (Mandarin) or 'yue' (Cantonese). Similarly, an
application
 already using tags that start with the 'ar' (Arabic) subtag
 might continue to use this more general subtag even for new
 data, which could be more precisely tagged with 'arb'
 (Standard Arabic) or any other subtag encompassed by the 'ar'
Macrolanguage.</t></section>

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Phillips, Addison
> Sent: 05 June 2008 20:38
> To: Broome, Karen; Peter Constable
> Cc: ltru@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] zh != Mandarin
>
> >
> > I agree that zh-cmn or cmn SHOULD be used. zh will remain valid and
> > includes both Mandarin and Cantonese, so MUST is too strong.
> >
> > I think this is the last of the disagreement. Mark Davis
> believes "zh"
> > SHOULD be used. Could we straw poll that?
> >
>
> SHOULD be used for what? From what I've read Mark Davis
> believes that he MAY use 'zh' to mean Mandarin.
>
> We already have a "rough consensus": let's work on text
> instead. Here is what I have revised the draft-15 text to say
> on the matter:
>
> --
> <section title="Using Extended Language Subtags"
> anchor="choiceUsingExtlang">
>
> <t>The Chinese ('zh') and Arabic ('ar') languages and the
> various sign languages ('sgn') have a long tradition of using
> specific primary language subtags, possibly coupled with
> various region subtags or as part of a registered
> grandfathered tag, to indicate the language. With the
> adoption of this document, specific ISO 639-3 assigned
> subtags became available to identify languages within these
> diverse language families or groupings. Other than the sign
> languages, which share a mode of communication rather than
> any linguistic heritage, this relationship is provided for in
> ISO 639-3 via a "macrolanguage" mapping. Other languages are
> encompassed by a macrolanguage and guidance on tagging these
> languages is provided below. For Arabic and Chinese, however,
> compatibility with existing tagging practices uses the
> extended language tag feature to allow tags consistent with
> user expectations in these language communities.</t>
>
> <t>Chinese ('zh') provides a useful illustration of this.
>   Many different kinds of content have used tags beginning
> with the 'zh' subtag, with application specific meaning being
> associated with region codes, private-use sequences, or
> grandfathered registered values. This is because historically
> only the macrolanguage subtag 'zh' was available for forming
> language tags. However, the languages encompassed by the
> Chinese subtag are, in the main, not mutually intelligible
> when spoken. Written forms of these languages also show wide
> variation in form and usage and many of these languages are
> written in various contexts.</t>
>
> <t>Rather than require all Chinese content to be retagged,
> this document provides a special compatibility mechanism: the
> extended language subtag. Chinese languages encompassed by
> the 'zh' subtag are in the registry as both primary language
> subtags and as extended language subtags. For example, the
> subtag for Cantonese is 'yue'. Content in Cantonese might
> historically have used a tag such as "zh-HK" (since Cantonese
> is spoken commonly in Hong Kong), although that tag actually
> means any type of Chinese as used in Hong Kong. With the
> availability of ISO 639-3 codes in the registry, content in
> Cantonese SHOULD use a tag containing the 'yue' subtag. For
> example, a document written in the Traditional script might
> use a tag such as "yue-Hant" or "zh-yue-Hant-HK".</t>
>
> <t>Applications MAY use the macrolanguage subtag to form the
> tag instead of using the more specific encompassed language
> subtag. For example, an application with large quantities of
> textual data already using tags with the 'zh' (Chinese)
> subtag might continue to use this more general subtag even
> for new data, even though the content could be more precisely
> be tagged with 'cmn' (Mandarin). Similarly, an application
> already using tags that start with the 'ar' (Arabic) subtag
> might continue to use this more general subtag even for new
> data, which could be more precisely be tagged with 'arb'
> (Standard Arabic).</t></section>
>
> --
>
> Addison
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru