IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis and draft-ietf-ltru-matching

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Thu, 29 August 2019 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CF3120071 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cAhtyG5hlscb for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CAA412004A for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id y19so3507900wrd.3 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ksjunRe4AYtvtZu5H//czyf1oBM5IsPN4ien4Os6Jnw=; b=sRcrgv9ijbOw99AVnBAehqqU5fiwJr1TcIMD5oH5pJ9ouiGFhRQ+0iPhCFReSOR+rh 4jfSST5DEX+rMwdN0DKukF/yDuUhJR2w78X5N1rrkcJVo/8XL4PrN32SSpTJ7qJpxudJ tZhdqd7Z2+eQkNYuoNktdYNt2hko1x++E6pbUmmoXkuEmV6DOx/MiU8BjYcjU559sQwa nFrM298TJVuyha/Qc1p4UBzvqPiNW7EZCemh2Ofghg+orkSrw+imNxnLAQaXHSkSPds3 W8JmzL7K6gstT69UldLImBvqY0rCAUHrYq6LHRjadA/8SaxpXEFkrwZQs0eR1ugHF7vw p6lA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ksjunRe4AYtvtZu5H//czyf1oBM5IsPN4ien4Os6Jnw=; b=rn+luF6G/AZTHbhKA9GzWqNcYHjbWPq/C2Q7EsSq/37ShHU8rLiJk6v2EUF/R1hjNW tLJN1nzVeGJh5zyObF0B+DfpQPv47EI8mco2nZ4v7zEz7TY8tS546uv7aiIY1TSPaOtV St5rYk75hm7M7Qq6g/wOKkCsLKufhEJ2mfE0uId1aQCzOKc9DDCqGgLqHJ1SOHXe0ZFy I+M3N28PFyMth0HEomZHD2URIYQVnEGTPFNt9bJgTPEGG1uCh5+7Ev2ex1ww+CwhTWhA vwtuS8gmWzfqyNDPstygncEQFrVw0GHy6+oc5yRkbWZ6SsiNfkcK/lR+wa4Bbxr+3Jh2 oyOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXO5GXSd/J/0CaQ8Yve4X9y0UIaHRN5FPOIFlVC9hjhsbg0MQFU VxayxhZH2DHJiOA8TwWQ42hbKhQr/5DFgr4Tv9ax0w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJV/2/pKD8lROscwBgT6RVUlgNsfs3qyxA4FuvoCNYK9O98HSQGJs+IYEBzh6rRWNus3vGNmYwAS/HvtHVeWU=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ea03:: with SMTP id q3mr11351279wrm.219.1567086262153; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 06:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190827104755.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.0f79efb126.wbe@email03.godaddy.com> <910CB6C8-9F66-4255-B149-B146DA8E5695@rivoal.net> <CAJ2xs_GWQH=zOvzVqUqpFKHmLKWZTR=ybJOv+K_SMhCW==X23g@mail.gmail.com> <73BE5AF7-0C62-425F-834E-8759628D2C5F@rivoal.net>
In-Reply-To: <73BE5AF7-0C62-425F-834E-8759628D2C5F@rivoal.net>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:44:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2gp_S+dDdgo9WsOixT_-jHkWZxmajWmx2MRKi0iDHVSwd-3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: Mark Davis ☕️ <mark@macchiato.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fd089a059141b35b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ltru/bMRxLtC_EYp0VizS7Ic6rMqSHCg>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis and draft-ietf-ltru-matching
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ltru/>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:44:26 -0000

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:00 AM Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:

>
> In case that influences what you have to say, note that what I intend to
> do is not to store the canonicalized-to-extlang form anywhere. It would
> only be for internal processing: when performing an extended filtering
> operation, where it is unknown whether the ranges and tags are in extlang
> form or not, canonicalize both to extlang form do the extended filtering
> operation on that.
>

In that case you can equally canonicalize away from the extlang form as
toward it.  I recommend that.


John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
        "Not to know The Smiths is not to know K.X.U."  --K.X.U.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email