Re: [Ltru] Last open item

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Tue, 15 April 2008 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B7F3A6B06; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB6228C1C9 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.351
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.248, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ofJ9n-K2EvnE for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B4E28C19A for <ltru@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1JlaeI-0003J5-T7; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:11:54 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:11:54 -0400
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <20080415021154.GK19045@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <30b660a20804101252p37e22884g6dfbec6dd17e5ea1@mail.gmail.com> <006101c89daa$323fc3e0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <30b660a20804140815w5d56933auefbdccdcbdfe034b@mail.gmail.com> <001e01c89e4b$897c0000$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <20080414193212.GI28132@mercury.ccil.org> <002601c89e94$80c98ce0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <002601c89e94$80c98ce0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Last open item
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Randy Presuhn scripsit:

> > Then we wind up with both the original tag and its temporary replacement
> > marked deprecated.  That's undesirable.
> 
> It would merely reflect what had happened in the source standards.

All too "merely".    What, in such circumstances, would a naive reader
of the registry conclude was the un-deprecated value, and by what process?

> No, if the Preferred-Value in BU refers to MM, then the logical thing to
> do is to *not* add a preferred-value to MM if it is ever deprecated in
> favor of something that would, for purposes of language tagging,
> identify the same thing. 

So then BU would be deprecated with a P-V of MM, and MM would be
deprecated without a P-V, leading the user to conclude that there is no
current value at all.

-- 
Evolutionary psychology is the theory           John Cowan
that men are nothing but horn-dogs,             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and that women only want them for their money.  cowan@ccil.org
        --Susan McCarthy (adapted)
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru