Re: [Ltru] Last open item

"Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org> Sat, 12 April 2008 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6123A6B07; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217513A6B07 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9gaeCO+JMP-u for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth20.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth20.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 224AB3A69AB for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21349 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2008 16:53:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (71.229.245.230) by smtpauth20.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.36) with ESMTP; 12 Apr 2008 16:53:49 -0000
Message-ID: <001801c89cbd$c815c100$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.57.1207940412.8530.ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:53:46 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Last open item
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Mark Davis <mark dot davis at icu dash project dot org> wrote:

> So my proposal is to change the above lines to drop the first one, and 
> change the second to:
>
> Values in the fields 'Type', 'Subtag', 'Tag', and 'Added' MUST NOT be 
> changed and are guaranteed to be stable over time. Values in the 
> 'Deprecated' and 'Preferred-Value' MUST NOT be changed unless the tag 
> or subtag in the Preferred-Value field is itself deprecated, or if a 
> deprecation is reversed in one of the source standards.

I no longer have a strong opinion on this.  I know that at one point it 
was agreed that we should never, ever change Deprecated and 
Preferred-Value fields, in the interest of stability.  If that is no 
longer a concern, or if we were wrong about the amount of stability thus 
provided, then this change is fine.

My usual concern is that, if we want to change one of our own decisions 
from the past, we should understand why we came to that decision in the 
first place.  That criterion seems to be fulfilled here.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Arvada, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru