IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lwip] Discussion about IoT Device Classes

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 03 February 2017 11:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCD8129C32 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 03:44:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pfYOQV7rjbbr for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 03:44:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C48301294CF for <lwip@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 03:44:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v13BiRjZ019055; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:44:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2002:8666:da7b::d4fd:f30f:3749:843b] (unknown [IPv6:2002:8666:da7b:0:d4fd:f30f:3749:843b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vFFQM0tkgz3ZbZ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:44:27 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170203113509.GA8117@hobbykeller.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 12:44:25 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 507815065.194532-18e903a07113a3aec7ef5e8d4e8c539e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <501731D2-096C-46E9-8CE2-70630CBAFF37@tzi.org>
References: <2e19e2da-f86d-3889-690d-4d624a2c4489@gmx.net> <132DAB99-A623-47CD-9636-7DF67D75C188@tzi.org> <F3B7F8F0-F8B4-4B57-92F6-22701D85787B@tzi.org> <2d9cf5f4-431c-a7ba-08a5-fd506b15912d@gmail.com> <CANK0pbZ8GAqfkZBk7u1xHVCL=befZHm7DY_Y0jZurwZKcU9i0w@mail.gmail.com> <f7bc46a7-8999-d1fa-9f1f-8c11975d7f5c@gmx.net> <20910.1485973931@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <f0bab42a-008a-a6fb-8bdb-d5c759dad0f8@gmx.net> <20170203113509.GA8117@hobbykeller.org>
To: Oliver Hahm <oliver.hahm@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/4BlNJF8JIn93SEiIXLp0iD_23SA>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] Discussion about IoT Device Classes
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 11:44:33 -0000

Class 0 devices cannot very well be full citizens of the Internet (at least we tried to define the class so this is approximately true), but they indeed can have some connectedness to them.
IPv6 beacons are one such example, but also maybe devices with local interconnects that talk to an IP node.  Section 5.2 has class I0 for the latter.  I0 devices may still terminate application protocols such as CoAP and security protocols (e.g., DCAF was designed so this is possible).

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email