[Lwip] Discussion about IoT Device Classes

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 25 January 2017 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E793129C5C for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:12:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I_tevZ_WG9fg for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5745129C79 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:12:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.91.172] ([178.48.1.89]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLunc-1cZqFA1CGK-007lCU for <lwip@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:12:08 +0100
To: "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <2e19e2da-f86d-3889-690d-4d624a2c4489@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 23:12:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eGd0rjKWqBSplSAgWSSqAENApa25kFVHc"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:E3lMUmv9oBDqHuE1FIl8Yh64kyjvUk6TBAPP1XuehvHNYfkWPZz PWnJvoKJBbp3ZJNMz1QN6h1FKRO6C0cw6pcvz9RO6yuFiMsavzSXIAIJqTQBgVkZDpCeKWT u0OKkiRJmbyAXz5nYkr9mJe+F97u66A+pnk5F7JhdNa28aWCN5e1Y9EvpaJlioZpMD/2emv F5hhp+49LCPSzUGK6pucQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hfJx5rzkrbo=:IMbNJKiOIprLLl07naAeQ2 BgtBNr3FWcaZOGX/Xr93koZjIyWa2fztl2f4vPLWXsTRHMACXaHDLi195z9/z1/mzMvw85lZN mBrgSO5vYOJH76QVWscT1zutASvWHI5vbHYGpH10Dl7A2HmgWmVrsmt5z5jXWx4O4VIaAenIa wG3D+zL+neoYgSIArvhKmSTbCjd6iGr/qK3bAqAdIU8ddx4Se12L3xWV2qOz34gorCBCMf7A/ YDg8D2fkq1Cxcxz7+KQzehf1K29K+FEnyD+rphwdaQupBwYT29V1QvkA3xfYlngTMZanmoqZY 0WqG0BEl4x5w3YBmPb6UkX9010SVUinVRPqTjVOTygl++z5xrOrmAgn9H+iwes4OR1U7zzYFf niDd/YfqvlkNRETwhxJk/jMlekoUIxE1yJMFIs4EDnCDK2E24wVdpo97jyi41ljWXusfOdWOY o6ZtnfeWyGupY4uU88iOcp8IWjDbijQujby74NMa4HHMvXnZmBa/wmIxtjUMqsN94R8hAbsy6 ZUetUU+6NjhujcvyObepGeqEwkLAl3L6VOe0wjDWnV/aGnuS1qaArQgqu40zUq7HEEqika6pY fRwwp9ZyEIVlibMODCj86b8NELXFNTJrDVhiys+y9itjsSTvaMEE7ErZy6hEMCQUOL7roedHb KlbLhrJ6SKoAG5HFoyk3ePVh+awlrIqx5CZYirc+n5YdUYsPebXSBxiUjKudLwY5ZLrHKdhMc ICQZLjr4C90MX6JRTCoAjJMrh2tgRYnFHkbPbG+3Nr3rgSydOFVwdHdjpyk=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/Et8gXRe6qZ447tIJMczVO5Q9UbU>
Subject: [Lwip] Discussion about IoT Device Classes
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 22:12:31 -0000

Hi all,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7228#section-3 defines these three
classes of IoT devices:

     +-------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
     | Name        | data size (e.g., RAM) | code size (e.g., Flash) |
     +-------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
     | Class 0, C0 | << 10 KiB             | << 100 KiB              |
     |             |                       |                         |
     | Class 1, C1 | ~ 10 KiB              | ~ 100 KiB               |
     |             |                       |                         |
     | Class 2, C2 | ~ 50 KiB              | ~ 250 KiB               |
     +-------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+

Is there an interest to get together at the next IETF meeting and to
talk about re-working on these classes and to provide more details about
the functionality that is included in this calculation based on ongoing
implementation work?

Ciao
Hannes