IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lwip] Discussion about IoT Device Classes

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 01 February 2017 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4EE129D26 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:54:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QjWlC-Nuk930 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:54:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8385B1299C5 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 10:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.91.173] ([195.149.223.239]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lj4xG-1c2fpI1yZi-00dHVU; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:54:06 +0100
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
References: <2e19e2da-f86d-3889-690d-4d624a2c4489@gmx.net> <132DAB99-A623-47CD-9636-7DF67D75C188@tzi.org> <F3B7F8F0-F8B4-4B57-92F6-22701D85787B@tzi.org> <2d9cf5f4-431c-a7ba-08a5-fd506b15912d@gmail.com> <CANK0pbZ8GAqfkZBk7u1xHVCL=befZHm7DY_Y0jZurwZKcU9i0w@mail.gmail.com> <f7bc46a7-8999-d1fa-9f1f-8c11975d7f5c@gmx.net> <20910.1485973931@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <f0bab42a-008a-a6fb-8bdb-d5c759dad0f8@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 19:54:03 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20910.1485973931@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XP054445wGjnfUVPw4MvEenjgBc8uN4o8"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:UaeEuurs/iV5uFE4Hbmk9TEfHF81nbkvt2jwHqRd4OugKx999Bf nn/AoNeGNWKZn6pvmogRxM7aE7gipxxY2DG84KdOGgHLge3dvJ3obbKFPy+HMmqXVyZrcLP LUCYO36srE112186M0moaLuO10GpPjrRuEPlCmAqEKwYq3P5GCOxk0cBJSH7fQGx/OjwJfJ VCXOnKpKPtHxGoilxSBmg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hEZUaxIPTqc=:RG0tgj734tm0O/C3eVbsn/ gAhcQxRuzQd6f/N8ucKzJJtKdbt/NbGh/VoJCe0YHTc69pFwOxTDe1KHhGoukrYEKZmeFKlq1 Xs2KQkWklCqhTWppGlkoswVJNUsfPuWjs4cde5BYV7NyOR8VIu2XiZ7AFymUOiPxnCZRaMLkT VVwTorrR617zFQSgcrShs+Qc8B4nCTl3YhXUfNcRF5TnsaNlYrRdqJqtdJteHxCJ4bUAZKx8X owr/i2jkBTaC/mxLDHBkFP0YzCSsSnTyozn426czsssauDYjVs+1pj/ExYnrISJu8daydMxDD qyz4GGd5G3SYHjcVF0ZjYk4UyJcH/wmA4pglG6o3LjNLxKShyHtB4dGnPiBEV8ehHjHBcGbT5 0KG19u5LBmeWRbliX0JNtDmXUQIdz5RvKhJ7/1UQt0RNQPtEpWm3geSv2oRpLYBV3sjUP60Bq IP236bNL8pr0m7PcK0ZfGhQu2maD87CWwTI2MzqW0PgFRupLsX1OYgIJXBqf3ddT/n1yyG73c av049geTnnnjBhzRpJdrw6oZ84k8lHpqrdgUJto4n0e7VfMPhSG6x66Fww8QDf9Z7+yJ4AuX6 DgTfHEyltDoKCBRoFzd9qrJMJv8R5e2XvaNlEfb/iRZoBEvzlXuZupW1nPFDKM6XKRL0A0+hP 23gh9QAGsPZjPHvPgxACJkvlg1WrmBD3tFQAgz/U0ZIvp8Fu35i4jF0wE9dghjpfVDVcC3p6W X6Os4S0+rmCLb6PtzxLdBezS3CWougbxGQI9YZ+d1SxZ2DSOOiD/xNKBFMc=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lwip/JMv4ym--xzJcA92qXgFtfKHClOM>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] Discussion about IoT Device Classes
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lwip/>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 18:54:15 -0000

Hi Michael,

On 02/01/2017 07:32 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:
>     > I agree with Emmanuel regarding the difference between the device that
>     > run a RTOS (or special IoT-designed OS) and the devices that run a
>     > general purpose OS, like Linux. This is also a differentiation we make,
>     > as you know.
> 
> And there is also some sub-classes of "Linux" that are relevant.

I personally care less about those sub-categories since I can map these
class 1 devices to Cortex M class processors and class 2 devices to
Cortex A class processors. For Intel, there are similar categories.

> 
>     > PS: I am not sure about the "motes". Are you talking about BLE beacons?
> 
> It's a good example. But really anything that basically can never be field
> upgraded.

I guess I am fine calling them class 0 devices that are basically
outside our scope since they do not run IP.


Ciao
Hannes

> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lwip mailing list
> Lwip@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email