Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology

<dominique.barthel@orange.com> Mon, 08 April 2013 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <dominique.barthel@orange.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5162F21F937F for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 06:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8XElOgzMk37v for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 06:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C6721F937D for <lwip@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 06:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.1]) by omfedm12.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 75AAC18C44C; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:06:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.183]) by omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 5AE5135C055; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:06:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:06:38 +0200
From: dominique.barthel@orange.com
To: "Cao Zhen (CZ)" <caozhen@chinamobile.com>, "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology
Thread-Index: Ac4zYMPX/q/pzk/ARPipDrdU0yerAQA8mIrAAAFPjGA=
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:06:37 +0000
Message-ID: <9197_1365426398_5162C0DE_9197_1740_1_8F1D83ADCC1AC94186A867BEE9B7D91306D464A9@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <20333_1365322988_51612CEC_20333_2363_1_014001ce3369$1794bf50$46be3df0$@chinamobile.com> <32006_1365423568_5162B5D0_32006_35_1_13512_1365423563_5162B5CB_13512_192_1_8F1D83ADCC1AC94186A867BEE9B7D91306D46450@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <32006_1365423568_5162B5D0_32006_35_1_13512_1365423563_5162B5CB_13512_192_1_8F1D83ADCC1AC94186A867BEE9B7D91306D46450@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2013.3.25.85421
Subject: Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:06:40 -0000

Sorry I was too quick in responding :-)
Now that I had coffee, I'm in favor of this WG draft becoming an Informational RFC.

Giving it a last browse, I have the following suggestions
- Section 2: "economically" -> "economically"
- Section 2.1, regarding the multiple facets: "- constraints on the maximum code size (ROM/Flash);", ..., "- constraints on the available electrical power". Do we want to mention CPU computational power as a possible constraint? RAM size is usually a limit before CPU power nowaday, but who knows.
- Section 2.2.1: what about explicating the MSL acronym as done for DTN in the following paragraph. I assume TCP does not need explicating.
- Section 3: Ki is not a standard prefix notation. K has traditionally been used for 1024 even though it is the SI unit for temperature. What about writing "kilobytes" in extenso, there seems to be room in the table anyway.
That's it folks

Dominique

-----Message d'origine-----
De : lwip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:lwip-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de dominique.barthel@orange.com
Envoyé : lundi 8 avril 2013 14:19
À : Cao Zhen (CZ); lwip@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology



I'm in favor of this document becoming a WG draft.
It is useful to have a common langage and references we can point newcomers to.

Dominique


-----Message d'origine-----
De : lwip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:lwip-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Cao Zhen (CZ) Envoyé : dimanche 7 avril 2013 10:23 À : lwip@ietf.org Objet : [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------


Dear All,

Discussion of lwig-terminology appears to have completed. The authors think this document is ready for working-group last call.

This is a two-week working-group last call for draft-ietf-lwig-terminology, for publication as an informational RFC. The working group last call ends at _April 20_

Please send your reviews and comments to the mailing list.  If you have reviewed the document, please do indicate whether you think it should go forward.

Thanks and regards,
Co-chairs



_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
Lwip@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.