IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology

"Cao Zhen \(CZ\)" <caozhen@chinamobile.com> Mon, 08 April 2013 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <caozhen@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F02321F9369 for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465, BAYES_00=-2.599, RELAY_IS_221=2.222]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jbTTaK6eAoMp for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta.chinamobile.com (cmccmta.chinamobile.com [221.176.64.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E64E21F93E2 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.20.11]) by rmmx-oa_allagent02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee25162e3dd825-2d825; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:35:58 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee25162e3dd825-2d825
Received: from cmccPC (unknown[172.16.20.81]) by rmsmtp-oa_rmapp01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee15162e3d8560-fb43c; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:35:57 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee15162e3d8560-fb43c
From: "Cao Zhen (CZ)" <caozhen@chinamobile.com>
To: 'Carsten Bormann' <cabo@tzi.org>, dominique.barthel@orange.com
References: <20333_1365322988_51612CEC_20333_2363_1_014001ce3369$1794bf50$46be3df0$@chinamobile.com> <32006_1365423568_5162B5D0_32006_35_1_13512_1365423563_5162B5CB_13512_192_1_8F1D83ADCC1AC94186A867BEE9B7D91306D46450@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <9197_1365426398_5162C0DE_9197_1740_1_8F1D83ADCC1AC94186A867BEE9B7D91306D464A9@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <C22A6D08-3104-425D-850D-4FCDAAAF2E99@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <C22A6D08-3104-425D-850D-4FCDAAAF2E99@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 23:36:22 +0800
Message-ID: <003201ce346e$d3395580$79ac0080$@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLX9vPkbl296O8O8XhdS7vokftkjwGl+5vMArDVREABRdLTPZaMCKKg
Content-Language: zh-cn
Cc: lwip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:36:37 -0000

> Re 2: We haven't tried to provide terminology for CPU speed, and I doubt
that we could come up
> with something very useful here.  The set of facets listed is intended as
a lead-in to the next
> sections (I notice that we failed to provide a pointer to section 4 here,
which I also added).
> I also think that CPU speed is rarely by itself a limiting factor creating
a "constrained device".
> 
> So I'm not as sure that we should add CPU speed to this list.  What do
other reviewers think?
>
I prefer to make what it is now. Communication costs more than computing,
that's why 6lowpan swaps computing with communication by compression. So
focusing on communication part is most valuable. 
Thanks,
zhen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email