Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 18 April 2013 08:54 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA6221F8EED for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 01:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.337
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ZlYh7pwYgPe for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 01:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69A721F8ED5 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 01:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3I8sFpw024272; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:54:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eduroam-pool3-111.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-pool3-111.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.232.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FA993D8B; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:54:15 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <031DD135F9160444ABBE3B0C36CED618C11457@011-DB3MPN2-083.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:54:15 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <64E6305D-109B-40E8-9CC6-F68CC55503E7@tzi.org>
References: <014001ce3369$1794bf50$46be3df0$@chinamobile.com> <031DD135F9160444ABBE3B0C36CED618C11457@011-DB3MPN2-083.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
To: "Dijk, Esko" <esko.dijk@philips.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:54:31 -0000

On Apr 18, 2013, at 10:51, "Dijk, Esko" <esko.dijk@philips.com> wrote:

> secion 2.3.1; one sentence I found very cryptic. Perhaps to be rephrased:
>        It is not clear that "LLN" is much more specific than "interesting" or "the network characteristics that RPL has been designed for".

I have some pretty good editorial comments from Emmanuel Baccelli on this section.
Hope I can send around an update proposal today...

Grüße, Carsten