Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology
ma yc <ycma610103@gmail.com> Tue, 16 April 2013 07:40 UTC
Return-Path: <ycma610103@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338B121F966B for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.933
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pv9yr81j+ZLY for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ia0-x22b.google.com (mail-ia0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101C321F9645 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id f27so152158iae.2 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Z+JBKlFqKw6O4v77O4qQ7N/VW9+9sUbSyDT2AWW+rN8=; b=vfyc2fO40u5rCr/zeaYVf0wYuQOdBnfsVUqcJPUJZJF8vodiNjdA+fSpXPeUiYNZzC uYdGIbjOxjEjmp9ozLCYr/hDvVqTNl2tcM2IrA26CDfiSOmxbkWFnULg7qtK7IpMEiey 2WIVE3gPBER756av5pnwp5lFsLDKwPc5/VvZ59eKTVC80LptF1DvEb8OL+V5xndoH6ta 48chaVaEO0QVeCMj7ylIirfVgdnX3vk86Vraxf2MgLlP6ShyYdi+I3cbzLh3MbiuFFNP PyV1Fe8ZLCjgl+qubRytVnAJH3zmqJcFatPgNlvtmb2TAQZtShF8kO3LmIBgqKBhucNB eBVw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.6.34 with SMTP id x2mr577583igx.86.1366097999672; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.244.201 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <84a57cd4d2b33108acdf8ef0988472ae@xs4all.nl>
References: <20333_1365322988_51612CEC_20333_2363_1_014001ce3369$1794bf50$46be3df0$@chinamobile.com> <13512_1365423563_5162B5CB_13512_192_1_8F1D83ADCC1AC94186A867BEE9B7D91306D46450@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <84a57cd4d2b33108acdf8ef0988472ae@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:39:59 +0800
Message-ID: <CAMuyTSXJy+Ta+NAb_zTU-Hiy5xkLtRLUYGDqG7Y6Q0Go47mKQg@mail.gmail.com>
From: ma yc <ycma610103@gmail.com>
To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd77124000be704da757a59"
Cc: "lwip@ietf.org" <lwip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 07:40:01 -0000
I support this document to go forward. Yuanchen 2013/4/8 peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> > without coffee, > I agree, > > peter > > dominique.barthel@orange.com schreef op 2013-04-08 14:19: > > I'm in favor of this document becoming a WG draft. >> It is useful to have a common langage and references we can point >> newcomers to. >> >> Dominique >> >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : lwip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:lwip-bounces@ietf.org] De la part >> de Cao Zhen (CZ) >> Envoyé : dimanche 7 avril 2013 10:23 >> À : lwip@ietf.org >> Objet : [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >> ------------------------------**- >> ------ >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> Discussion of lwig-terminology appears to have completed. The authors >> think this document is ready for working-group last call. >> >> This is a two-week working-group last call for >> draft-ietf-lwig-terminology, for publication as an informational RFC. >> The working group last call ends at _April 20_ >> >> Please send your reviews and comments to the mailing list. If you >> have reviewed the document, please do indicate whether you think it >> should go forward. >> >> Thanks and regards, >> Co-chairs >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Lwip mailing list >> Lwip@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/lwip<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip> >> >> ______________________________**______________________________** >> ______________________________**______________________________**_ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations >> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous >> avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les >> messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a >> ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or >> privileged information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender >> and delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for >> messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Lwip mailing list >> Lwip@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/lwip<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > Lwip mailing list > Lwip@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/lwip<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip> >
- [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Cao Zhen (CZ)
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology dominique.barthel
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology dominique.barthel
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology peter van der Stok
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Cao Zhen (CZ)
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology ma yc
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology HS Zhang
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Dijk, Esko
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Cao Zhen (CZ)
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Dijk, Esko
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann