Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology
"Cao Zhen \(CZ\)" <caozhen@chinamobile.com> Mon, 22 April 2013 06:40 UTC
Return-Path: <caozhen@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lwip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CB521F8A0B for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RELAY_IS_221=2.222]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8B2a7MfbGTiO for <lwip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta.chinamobile.com (cmccmta.chinamobile.com [221.176.64.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D334821F89E2 for <lwip@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.20.11]) by rmmx-oa_allagent02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee25174db5144e-6144e; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:40:17 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee25174db5144e-6144e
Received: from cmccPC (unknown[10.2.52.231]) by rmsmtp-oa_rmapp01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee15174db4d05e-4c074; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:40:17 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee15174db4d05e-4c074
From: "Cao Zhen (CZ)" <caozhen@chinamobile.com>
To: lwip@ietf.org
References: <014001ce3369$1794bf50$46be3df0$@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <014001ce3369$1794bf50$46be3df0$@chinamobile.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:40:45 +0800
Message-ID: <008101ce3f24$52c221f0$f84665d0$@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIKk9f6oNsdHSCSeQ0rQN7OIFrNIZhpH76Q
Content-Language: zh-cn
Subject: Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology
X-BeenThere: lwip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight IP stack <lwip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lwip>
List-Post: <mailto:lwip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip>, <mailto:lwip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 06:40:55 -0000
Dear All, The two-week WGLC has finished and I received a number of supports and some positive discussion. Please the authors update the draft and we will move forward. Thanks and regards, zhen > -----Original Message----- > From: lwip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:lwip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cao Zhen (CZ) > Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 4:23 PM > To: lwip@ietf.org > Subject: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology > > Dear All, > > Discussion of lwig-terminology appears to have completed. The authors think this document is > ready for working-group last call. > > This is a two-week working-group last call for draft-ietf-lwig-terminology, for publication as an > informational RFC. The working group last call ends at _April 20_ > > Please send your reviews and comments to the mailing list. If you have reviewed the document, > please do indicate whether you think it should go forward. > > Thanks and regards, > Co-chairs > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > Lwip@ietf.org > https://w
- [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Cao Zhen (CZ)
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology dominique.barthel
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology dominique.barthel
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology peter van der Stok
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Cao Zhen (CZ)
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology ma yc
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology HS Zhang
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Dijk, Esko
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Cao Zhen (CZ)
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Dijk, Esko
- Re: [Lwip] WGLC for lwig-terminology Carsten Bormann