[manet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 15 December 2016 14:39 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: manet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5A1129FE2; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:39:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148181277830.27651.2048933448078334926.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:39:38 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/0J9fph7kAJ3FKEzCISLP66x_UFs>
Cc: manet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-manet-dlep@ietf.org, manet-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [manet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:39:38 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - 5.1: Is a modem supposed to ignore peer discovery signals from routers with which the modem does not have a TCP connection? - 10.7: This says: "If the modem is capable of understanding and forwarding this information (via mechanisms not defined by DLEP)," I don't get why that's here, can you explain? If modem-modem comms is part of DLEP deployments (even if not fully spec'd) then that does change the security model. - 10.9 and elsewhere: none of these messages have anything like a cookie. Why not? That'd help mitigate potential off path attacks, where we currently depend solely on TTL=255 (and TLS, which seems to not be some people's favourite;-) - 11.8/9: are there any special addresses that MUST NOT occur here? E.g. ::1, 127.0.0.10? What about the addresses IANA allocates for you from 13.14/15? - 11.10/11: what does prefix=0 mean? - I agree with Alexey's DISCUSS#3, the TLS stuff needs more work to be usable. Maybe recommend PSK?
- [manet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-i… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [manet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [manet] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dra… Rick Taylor