[manet] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with COMMENT)

["Alissa Cooper" <[e-mail]>]

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

For the Latency and Relative Link Quality metrics, it seems like allowing
their measurement methods to be implementation-dependent reduces their
usefulness. If two different implementations calculate these in different
ways, then the results may not be comparable. Are these not meant to be
compared between different destination implementations?