IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 15 December 2016 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494C5129423; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:56:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=lH8ZPMb7; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=MCPcuhJl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R0QB-Vu76Dxe; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3ADE120725; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F3E20A29; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:56:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:56:49 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=5S0pmWvB3OVBfl+1Y7nRmuG3eEc=; b=lH8ZPM b7XvlCF97lD7/UfplLQ8BDMm9MKvOIeOrigFhjMPa9aZRMn9a8W6PlGgr6dapgGo fh5+uNQodDJ56inLsMbLj4+RtbETTq8sbF+ThU10a2/ti2UlR5tUPDR4L3+Q8ZYC nEnkilD4n6xYrnozuE1IHItuwRlciW6yAsRec=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=5S0pmWvB3OVBfl +1Y7nRmuG3eEc=; b=MCPcuhJlpT3WtMO2iwNUwRCD6BUiXf5Q2vZEL3IuOO+dyq Lw7ZhRIaGSrT+gMbbGzaPOwgPYUKlLCRgUvAAp0geE94+ErhUMwYVDN38+Woyt9/ 0bQAEgZ00Yx5LGKn3pYqD9WOhFKp6+8QpQj/px7XTVmeAn9s4/pSxWN38UG0M=
X-ME-Sender: <xms:YdlSWGTz0CinBq-X6sqQLAxoTHOna3OiVof_sDfMG6E7Nacivw16LQ>
X-Sasl-enc: Z7sn5BJEBHsUi4wSLJ1e/PLI9aKjm8zDcN5mbg/XceKt 1481824608
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8819.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.169]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E3B2F241D1; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:56:47 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9614C8F7-C561-42E5-81E0-0859805DFF83"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <1481816722.2566.45.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 12:56:46 -0500
Message-Id: <6F404885-55CA-4029-8AEF-B91C5B61EBC2@cooperw.in>
References: <148174234095.16918.11283344396419538138.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B177F831FB91F242972D0C35F6A0733163AE4F47@SUCNPTEXM01.com.ad.uk.ds.corp> <234FB6D4-831A-46A8-907A-59D2784C35D7@cooperw.in> <1481816722.2566.45.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
To: Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/DxJjOfilsoOtZdIuLbe3cTJgtKk>
Cc: "rick.taylor.external@airbus.com" <rick.taylor.external@airbus.com>, "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-manet-dlep@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-manet-dlep@ietf.org>, "manet-chairs@ietf.org" <manet-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:56:51 -0000

Hi Rick,

> On Dec 15, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Rick Taylor <rick@tropicalstormsoftware.com> wrote:
> 
> Ironically, there is a draft that has just been adopted by the WG, that
> describes a DLEP extension for min/max for the latency metric.

Oh good.

> 
> The first paragraph of Section 4 attempts to suggest that metrics
> should be an (perhaps rolling) average over a "...large enough sample
> sizes will preclude short traffic bursts from adversely skewing
> reported values..."
> 
> But perhaps that text needs improving? 

I would say so, I found it to be vague.

Thanks,
Alissa

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email