Re: [manet] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 15 December 2016 14:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C06E12965C for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:51:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9XbmevAeJ3PH for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:51:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C5512965A for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 06:51:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 13917 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2016 15:44:27 +0100
Received: from p5dec26d9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (93.236.38.217) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 15 Dec 2016 15:44:27 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <1481812750.414535.820052825.22514754@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:44:27 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <785D99A9-2053-4111-87CD-B5F45CE39C78@kuehlewind.net>
References: <148173557020.16832.1794865129983846438.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1481812750.414535.820052825.22514754@webmail.messagingengine.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/ujnJqat9EAH6ZnTlLfhoaUa7RVI>
Cc: manet-chairs@ietf.org, manet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-manet-dlep@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:51:18 -0000
Ah, completely missed that. Yes, please make it clearer. Having it in the tables is rather uncommon. Thanks! Clearing my discuss now! > Am 15.12.2016 um 15:39 schrieb Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>: > > Hi Mirja, > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016, at 05:12 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote: > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Am I missing something or does the doc not specify which policy/policies >> should be used for registration of new values in these new registries? >> (Also previously mentioned by the tsv-art reviewer - thx!) > > It is specified in the IANA registration tables. Maybe it can be made > clearer. > > Best Regards, > Alexey >
- [manet] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-m… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [manet] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ie… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [manet] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ie… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)