Re: [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: (with COMMENT)
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 02 June 2016 05:30 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02A812B020; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWK5V2DujaID; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BBB112B03E; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 22:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1671; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464845455; x=1466055055; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h7w6fZanmNJRv2ySK5egPbeC7G79fkchWgoFcsnyoZk=; b=koPKxQfwSnfFXRXUAuOjor2fJtyKeG49DzWCqx/fxTuKfMRt42VijBM5 cFVBsxRJIPqnNJ3B02oDPyg0AEHTs5feR9x9KU52UmAiM4LbpovBh66bi hsTYdqm7q57707mg687CgsPXTeorgMIz4/54iOUdQ1eTUS8OgbEw+zF7/ M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,404,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="637791665"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jun 2016 05:30:52 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.86] (ams-bclaise-8915.cisco.com [10.60.67.86]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u525UqBl028495; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 05:30:52 GMT
To: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
References: <20160601095358.16155.90619.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAK=bVC-jULUV6VPjEN9eV95Ha=TEF4_O6stgocSz+eJvM9L=3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <9ef27b05-2398-2d30-8715-4e9a36dd8ad7@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 07:30:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAK=bVC-jULUV6VPjEN9eV95Ha=TEF4_O6stgocSz+eJvM9L=3g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/2-S5efIEPtH7m9hbVwcjD-MGhas>
Cc: manet-chairs@ietf.org, Christopher Dearlove <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>, manet@ietf.org, Michael MacFaden <mrm@vmware.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 05:30:59 -0000
Thank you Ulrich. Regards, B. > Benoit, > > thanks, I have added that sentence after the first sentence in section > 1.1 (assuming that this is where you wanted to add it). > > Best regards > Ulrich > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: >> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The introduction in section 1 needs to mention this message: This >> revision to RFC 6779 is necessitated by the update to RFC 6130 specified >> in RFC 7466. >> >> Thanks for >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06#section-1.1 >> >> The MIB doctor review was done by Mike MacFaden. >> And the rfcdiff between RFC6779 and this document looks about right. >> >> Finally, keeping >> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/writable-mib-module.html in >> consideration, I believe this work is clearly justified as it updates an >> existing MIB module. >> >> > . >
- [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-iet… Benoit Claise
- Re: [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft… Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft… Benoit Claise