[manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: (with COMMENT)
"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 09:53 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB0D12D098; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 02:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.21.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160601095358.16155.90619.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 02:53:58 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/wAQVzNyAZOaVjqo7ggVoLuuUUb0>
Cc: manet-chairs@ietf.org, chris.dearlove@baesystems.com, manet@ietf.org, mrm@vmware.com, draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis@ietf.org
Subject: [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:53:58 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The introduction in section 1 needs to mention this message: This revision to RFC 6779 is necessitated by the update to RFC 6130 specified in RFC 7466. Thanks for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06#section-1.1 The MIB doctor review was done by Mike MacFaden. And the rfcdiff between RFC6779 and this document looks about right. Finally, keeping https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/writable-mib-module.html in consideration, I believe this work is clearly justified as it updates an existing MIB module.
- [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-iet… Benoit Claise
- Re: [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft… Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft… Benoit Claise