Re: [manet] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: (with COMMENT)

[Ulrich Herberg <[e-mail]>]

Benoit,

thanks, I have added that sentence after the first sentence in section
1.1 (assuming that this is where you wanted to add it).

Best regards
Ulrich

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Benoit Claise <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The introduction in section 1 needs to mention this message: This
> revision to RFC 6779 is necessitated by the update to RFC 6130 specified
> in RFC 7466.
>
> Thanks for
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-rfc6779bis-06#section-1.1
>
> The MIB doctor review was done by Mike MacFaden.
> And the rfcdiff between RFC6779 and this document looks about right.
>
> Finally, keeping
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/writable-mib-module.html in
> consideration, I believe this work is clearly justified as it updates an
> existing MIB module.
>
>