Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt
Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 01:01 UTC
Return-Path: <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC4C1294CC; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:01:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sAinK39QWqQM; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:01:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x233.google.com (mail-it0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2132129592; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:01:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l8so37631168iti.1; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:01:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jFqUCAmB1sLeiy0UN/Cb90mlsJc9Fzub6TlOJAYGZOk=; b=X76f8J2rQlI607nQ1YZCU+ejsW9E9EyILFj0GJX5pqMQ37YPTb5S9w3F52TtLsCpV+ ONngnPyCQ2dqdAZJWSgDcWyKtwT2yWwIbH9ESmmIkBelj4oAE6+7zajYpRkvzSy98bi+ X7SZRtTBDZBpErpcLNnfd/XlZhPY2TXsqK0/NwOuh9Ppv6+0Aqn9wQPTy//XxBQ7P8oV rmzKf6N613n6ML4iDduSSZdAZ9zBdwvYH7aB1gmC0RoBohGFxfF1ffZLoxJlNdYyovzX qeqwuIarh5mvUb/OHqce6mPX1m1ob0x7WWC27sAh3zrAyFs4RQ+7iiIIVE6zTYM8NIX6 cSzA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jFqUCAmB1sLeiy0UN/Cb90mlsJc9Fzub6TlOJAYGZOk=; b=k+lv57oZbGHXl8dfxwfyuAGjC0QPhHQPTKV/vBqAp0CnlB4+B6i58jAfrLxZZGMWAy hcSr2V5sag+KYB9EDDygVfhsCehBuJ46SlcT94J3vLVNE6TTvaoErNPFXqJil7FEOd8x PNw6xbp4CC/fLClURGMtMdSJtOxiNS5TpDnrPIMiWO/wdfi2Z9nQ5ec/V0QY6ZXV9cLT LGspJUAEc70UTG8uh3y9cTpUPTlqPLIFRjxNIBdAlRlAxZBlPPqcGJ0jJYpoOXdHePmZ qmAeaLl/FfmcaIACbDiFif40AX7SZi9PAsBh8oc3W6zpLYayRRfQN68OmeQeCYtGJ5Q7 EONg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdtegOqX3C/XEz/2xA6wEiCiygoHEo5Ar0ZXU5Z1Gt2tHIUBSJSWLobbBzFFMJ+p9/OqPHalVdwyT35TA==
X-Received: by 10.36.74.6 with SMTP id k6mr5583792itb.88.1479258087143; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:01:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.13.22 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:01:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F962A73C-519F-4CF2-B30D-7D5A7966693B@cisco.com>
References: <147766867219.24867.11477260153400004301.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALtoyon=GquiVHQuDm75y9uJXoqmE7xZuyQVpBW-mn_vFJv-0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1580c14baf8.2818.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <CALtoyonXmdm7duTqEn432JNabAvzu9_1MXEq4EG6X0NreeVTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <6a40465a-3385-e9ff-c227-5928c4c32155@labn.net> <CALtoyonCSMDzESvT=g5+w4jF5v_ZE9eyAoaJB-5Gred9=n6jfA@mail.gmail.com> <F962A73C-519F-4CF2-B30D-7D5A7966693B@cisco.com>
From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:01:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CALtoyo=x9+pZ3hLx-vadtuGjUKEFCs3Z_BnXDh+ZzmtakM3Wmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144a338d0bf990541609c23"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/4GinXVJFTMXAZBu4mRpq6WzON-c>
Cc: "manet-ads@ietf.org" <manet-ads@ietf.org>, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 01:01:37 -0000
Alvaro, I'm fine with SHOULD. Regards, Stan On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com> wrote: > Lou: > > Hi! > > Would "SHOULD " make you feel better? I can live with that. > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > Thumb typed and autocorrected. > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 9:19 AM, Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com> wrote: > > Lou, > > I 100% agree with you. But this was an AD (Alvaro) "request". I use > "request" in quotes, as it was along the lines of "an offer you can't > refuse"... > > Regards, > Stan > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote: > >> Thanks Stan. I have some concerns over the following new text: >> >> > If the router and modem support both IPv4 and IPv6, the >> IPv6 transport MUST be used for the DLEP session. >> >> To me the choice of v6 vs v4 *usage* is a deployment choice and not a >> protocol interop issue. The new text literally precludes an operator >> from choosing v4 in their network. I think this is inappropriate and >> means that the protocol can't be deployed in certain combinations (i.e., >> an implementation that supports v6 but a network that chooses not to.) >> >> Lou >> >> On 10/29/2016 1:26 AM, Stan Ratliff wrote: >> > Lou, >> > >> > That was an AD request. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Stan >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net >> > <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote: >> > >> > Can elaborate on the new v6 requirement? It doesn't impact >> > interoperability and may not be the right default for all. >> > >> > Lou >> > >> > On October 28, 2016 11:44:40 AM Stan Ratliff >> > <ratliffstan@gmail.com <mailto:ratliffstan@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> >> Hello WG participants, >> >> >> >> As you can see, we posted a new version of DLEP. This addresses >> >> comments from the AD review, and clarifies handling of IPv4/IPv6 >> >> address and subnet Data Items (issue brought on-list be David >> >> Wiggins). >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Stan >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:31 AM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org >> >> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line >> >> Internet-Drafts directories. >> >> This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks of >> >> the IETF. >> >> >> >> Title : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) >> >> Authors : Stan Ratliff >> >> Shawn Jury >> >> Darryl Satterwhite >> >> Rick Taylor >> >> Bo Berry >> >> Filename : draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt >> >> Pages : 74 >> >> Date : 2016-10-28 >> >> >> >> Abstract: >> >> When routing devices rely on modems to effect >> >> communications over >> >> wireless links, they need timely and accurate knowledge of >> the >> >> characteristics of the link (speed, state, etc.) in order >> >> to make >> >> routing decisions. In mobile or other environments where >> >> these >> >> characteristics change frequently, manual configurations >> >> or the >> >> inference of state through routing or transport protocols >> >> does not >> >> allow the router to make the best decisions. A >> >> bidirectional, event- >> >> driven communication channel between the router and the >> >> modem is >> >> necessary. >> >> >> >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep/ >> >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep/> >> >> >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25 >> >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25> >> >> >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25 >> >> <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the >> >> time of submission >> >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> >> tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>. >> >> >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> manet mailing list >> >> manet@ietf.org <mailto:manet@ietf.org> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >> >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> manet mailing list >> >> manet@ietf.org <mailto:manet%40ietf.org> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >> >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet> >> >> >> > >> >> >
- [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Rick Taylor