Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt

["Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <[e-mail]>]

FYI..

There was a discussion in the room (before your sound came on).  We all agree on the intent, but maybe the language is not clear enough.  I think Lou got an AI to suggest txt -- check the minutes.  ;-)

Thanks!

Alvaro.

Thumb-typed and autocorrected..

On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Stan Ratliff <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Alvaro,

I'm fine with SHOULD.

Regards,
Stan


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Lou:

Hi!

Would "SHOULD " make you feel better?  I can live with that.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

Thumb typed and autocorrected.

On Nov 16, 2016, at 9:19 AM, Stan Ratliff <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Lou,

I 100% agree with you. But this was an AD (Alvaro) "request". I use "request" in quotes, as it was along the lines of "an offer you can't refuse"...

Regards,
Stan


On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Lou Berger <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Thanks Stan.  I have some concerns over the following new text:

> If the router and modem support both IPv4 and IPv6, the
   IPv6 transport MUST be used for the DLEP session.

To me the choice of v6 vs v4 *usage* is a deployment choice and not a
protocol interop issue.  The new text literally precludes an operator
from choosing v4 in their network.  I think this is inappropriate and
means that the protocol can't be deployed in certain combinations (i.e.,
an implementation that supports v6 but a network that chooses not to.)

Lou

On 10/29/2016 1:26 AM, Stan Ratliff wrote:
> Lou,
>
> That was an AD request.
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Lou Berger <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> <mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>> wrote:
>
>     Can elaborate on the new v6 requirement?  It doesn't impact
>     interoperability and may not be the right default for all.
>
>     Lou
>
>     On October 28, 2016 11:44:40 AM Stan Ratliff
>     <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>> wrote:
>
>>     Hello WG participants,
>>
>>     As you can see, we posted a new version of DLEP. This addresses
>>     comments from the AD review, and clarifies handling of IPv4/IPv6
>>     address and subnet Data Items (issue brought on-list be David
>>     Wiggins).
>>
>>     Regards,
>>     Stan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:31 AM, <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
>>         Internet-Drafts directories.
>>         This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks of
>>         the IETF.
>>
>>                 Title           : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP)
>>                 Authors         : Stan Ratliff
>>                                   Shawn Jury
>>                                   Darryl Satterwhite
>>                                   Rick Taylor
>>                                   Bo Berry
>>                 Filename        : draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt
>>                 Pages           : 74
>>                 Date            : 2016-10-28
>>
>>         Abstract:
>>            When routing devices rely on modems to effect
>>         communications over
>>            wireless links, they need timely and accurate knowledge of the
>>            characteristics of the link (speed, state, etc.) in order
>>         to make
>>            routing decisions.  In mobile or other environments where
>>         these
>>            characteristics change frequently, manual configurations
>>         or the
>>            inference of state through routing or transport protocols
>>         does not
>>            allow the router to make the best decisions.  A
>>         bidirectional, event-
>>            driven communication channel between the router and the
>>         modem is
>>            necessary.
>>
>>
>>         The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep/
>>         <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep/>
>>
>>         There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>         https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25
>>         <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25>
>>
>>         A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>         https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25
>>         <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25>
>>
>>
>>         Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the
>>         time of submission
>>         until the htmlized version and diff are available at
>>         tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org> <http://tools.ietf.org>.
>>
>>         Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>         ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>         <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         manet mailing list
>>         [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>         <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     manet mailing list
>>     [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <mailto:manet%40ietf.org<mailto:manet%2540ietf.org>>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>
>>
>