[manet] Manet meeting
Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 02:01 UTC
Return-Path: <bebemaster@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039F2129628 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:01:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQszl8FhLTc9 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22f.google.com (mail-ua0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADF6412958D for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 20so103049155uak.0 for <manet@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:01:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JVqIsb6UBZ8FUMZ/TZdgRPKWNnEpo2xfOVT7vhxsdxk=; b=CPtR+JhEx3gvHcGMVUSSB4NFPhG7hUUpbgjqeBcEqHF9aHrIiM1Rju5zx1JRZshMDo fKGapAZZcS/2tvoNMqjlf0AwNHdcAYtvFMG1u7TLtJVG9cNEurdkNYYp0ylBdKi/Jcn3 Uqnp2uQEl4BMR8P8z1OOFNgAtXE9JrcDhBJdmwY6d2sufvCBs6qkCb6EDvNy7qXfTPK6 7QreHhDuZexFPwffjC1CL0ToGJvHyfUv/kDj1lLn6jfwMe+AH9LtkohytdbhY0YTvXyS q1BaKtpz7O0wrJOZOX5yIEAHGUpS1ZKLFstueYolKy9+MBFEGd8/UM8p9FD3eqxZSOGU Wm4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JVqIsb6UBZ8FUMZ/TZdgRPKWNnEpo2xfOVT7vhxsdxk=; b=kwk+x2Fh9sF2iHVyEXp0ftGSDF+xLrObl4ZmnEnIFseUkUSTo+QNfqE95E+5fL/JJN X0dmyHSoDgpSK7SAxya8Ho9BQlrPpmXd71Zl5TxZy7Y3tK3YPmk+dCXXvBHKL/mWoGFY qZcBJJ0ZIbr46eKHEgvwF0Fb3llLIFDD/NuHTzL3FuCV919GIpiqcsbMoSb2W7xRBL6f Lp4o9fr4AoR/LQc57KbRXixIGE+DpyTv5gdYKyXrd88PldAhNuqkm2IFTjtx86sjWAWl XhoprPq6U4rCv60WRpA0VWPQdyUgdXaEj4pD1d2CHfJQJmIzgoiTzHVnBTH8FKR2KU0c 6YVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvf7Jrl8+gBOLYQMpD8JJh411SjnlN4eUhbNlzzbQwERkHLmczTnm6PxJbEfK0wd8EgBxQLir6PVWhMpYw==
X-Received: by 10.159.32.133 with SMTP id 5mr278437uaa.145.1479261663631; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:01:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.36.115 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:01:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Justin Dean <bebemaster@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:01:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+-pDCeK6rziiJphEZZ_Dk02TX+0XTRJwFjshMJwvyLb3HG-EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0b6202fd9ed705416171df"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/lX0umUAFB7hwgygH-huGDVLL61I>
Subject: [manet] Manet meeting
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:01:06 -0000
I did my best with following along and taking notes. I had the audio cut out twice on me and the meetcho stopped right before the end so I missed that. (which I think this email will have quite a bit to do with) Thank you Rick for jumping in last minute to make the meeting go smoothly. Lou presented multiple DLEP extension drafts and it seemed from the audio that excepting a few questions about details that there was a general consensus for support for working on these. (I didn't heard the end of the meeting so please let me know if this question came up.) With the credit draft which is a superset of the current extension draft I think we need to have some discussion of. Do we just move forward with what we have and an superset extension will be fine later. (my vote here) Or we do update the current draft with the newer features included in this draft. Which of the drafts should we adopt as WG items? Please voice support or hesitations on why we shouldn't. Justin
- [manet] Manet meeting Justin Dean