Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt
"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 00:27 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEDF129612; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:27:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxRD7pjvU6Gj; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:27:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8144F12960E; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:27:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17117; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479256028; x=1480465628; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=KVQT8N7u55GpvecdMhqcSwDgFcvk6bhIqrwiMmzPenQ=; b=PqK9dX36pEL1fEyB0qFG8K3ofCMqBWgXlMOHOxyNAi1X5pFknT0nz9ll cRVVqJYTHdTLswXgJHDHpt18jXcPnkHxEZcPMmvFc241p5VmvPYz5ot3t jSGn9dZ1e5w+2WAwYpf5fdZAuIw88UW75JsGky8lYl7eVsNasAVD1iPcC A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AdAQBHpytY/5ldJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzcBAQEBAR9YgQCNPpcOh2yHWoUcggcdAQqEIYFaAoIhPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRhAQEBAwEBAQFrCwULAgEIGCcHIQYLFBECBA4FiFIDDwgOs3GHSw2EEAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyGPIF9gVWBCIJIgj6Cc4IwBZRZhTM1AYY7gw6DUINIgW9PhCeJPYkehCmECQEPDzeBBBMJgmiCNHKIGgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,497,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="171580959"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2016 00:27:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAG0R7Ga027588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:27:07 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:27:06 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:27:06 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSMTBaND8s7+yygU6nfaZ0lTgVQqC+VasAgAAJRICAAAKCAIAc2qwAgAAEVID//52A0A==
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:27:06 +0000
Message-ID: <F962A73C-519F-4CF2-B30D-7D5A7966693B@cisco.com>
References: <147766867219.24867.11477260153400004301.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALtoyon=GquiVHQuDm75y9uJXoqmE7xZuyQVpBW-mn_vFJv-0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1580c14baf8.2818.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net> <CALtoyonXmdm7duTqEn432JNabAvzu9_1MXEq4EG6X0NreeVTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <6a40465a-3385-e9ff-c227-5928c4c32155@labn.net>, <CALtoyonCSMDzESvT=g5+w4jF5v_ZE9eyAoaJB-5Gred9=n6jfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALtoyonCSMDzESvT=g5+w4jF5v_ZE9eyAoaJB-5Gred9=n6jfA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F962A73C519F4CF2B30D7D5A7966693Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/Q7MjBMNXNjMFAlOcp5gcop0P_oE>
Cc: "manet-ads@ietf.org" <manet-ads@ietf.org>, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:27:10 -0000
Lou: Hi! Would "SHOULD " make you feel better? I can live with that. Thanks! Alvaro. Thumb typed and autocorrected. On Nov 16, 2016, at 9:19 AM, Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@gmail.com<mailto:ratliffstan@gmail.com>> wrote: Lou, I 100% agree with you. But this was an AD (Alvaro) "request". I use "request" in quotes, as it was along the lines of "an offer you can't refuse"... Regards, Stan On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote: Thanks Stan. I have some concerns over the following new text: > If the router and modem support both IPv4 and IPv6, the IPv6 transport MUST be used for the DLEP session. To me the choice of v6 vs v4 *usage* is a deployment choice and not a protocol interop issue. The new text literally precludes an operator from choosing v4 in their network. I think this is inappropriate and means that the protocol can't be deployed in certain combinations (i.e., an implementation that supports v6 but a network that chooses not to.) Lou On 10/29/2016 1:26 AM, Stan Ratliff wrote: > Lou, > > That was an AD request. > > Regards, > Stan > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net> > <mailto:lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>>> wrote: > > Can elaborate on the new v6 requirement? It doesn't impact > interoperability and may not be the right default for all. > > Lou > > On October 28, 2016 11:44:40 AM Stan Ratliff > <ratliffstan@gmail.com<mailto:ratliffstan@gmail.com> <mailto:ratliffstan@gmail.com<mailto:ratliffstan@gmail.com>>> wrote: > >> Hello WG participants, >> >> As you can see, we posted a new version of DLEP. This addresses >> comments from the AD review, and clarifies handling of IPv4/IPv6 >> address and subnet Data Items (issue brought on-list be David >> Wiggins). >> >> Regards, >> Stan >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:31 AM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> >> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>> wrote: >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line >> Internet-Drafts directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks of >> the IETF. >> >> Title : Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) >> Authors : Stan Ratliff >> Shawn Jury >> Darryl Satterwhite >> Rick Taylor >> Bo Berry >> Filename : draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt >> Pages : 74 >> Date : 2016-10-28 >> >> Abstract: >> When routing devices rely on modems to effect >> communications over >> wireless links, they need timely and accurate knowledge of the >> characteristics of the link (speed, state, etc.) in order >> to make >> routing decisions. In mobile or other environments where >> these >> characteristics change frequently, manual configurations >> or the >> inference of state through routing or transport protocols >> does not >> allow the router to make the best decisions. A >> bidirectional, event- >> driven communication channel between the router and the >> modem is >> necessary. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep/ >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-manet-dlep/> >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25 >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25> >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25 >> <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the >> time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org> <http://tools.ietf.org>. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> <ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> manet mailing list >> manet@ietf.org<mailto:manet@ietf.org> <mailto:manet@ietf.org<mailto:manet@ietf.org>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> manet mailing list >> manet@ietf.org<mailto:manet@ietf.org> <mailto:manet%40ietf.org<mailto:manet%2540ietf.org>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet> >> >
- [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.txt internet-drafts
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Lou Berger
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [manet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25.… Rick Taylor