IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E42A12943D; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:03:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UMJLGj6u0IWm; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:03:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ACBA12965B; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:03:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id n204so67165228qke.2; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:03:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fQAYlhBFmh7QYVHGXCM2VhU5hSckDPDO7qHrRxoBhi8=; b=hmC4EtiQeYJSmHqpY7mvRb6bytnZzqxRsDvN/EvVfXFdYwSabB/TmZzkFK0XJx39t3 p9Mk/Z7xq+KvIE3N0FPDwvkp2EOd/aK8UZCvULjmbOEX/SQPls3Flyq5J5u+C5SPeayD /59TOETuDYQfwVwGtSCu+sPRYqhqu9IOBItxjACa0T5WrmewmUZllaFf9ynWGoTckGHs UxUI11Sa+7oCso7H7obQGWC7P/6I4uc8X8gTw5wZs+8QIEcQWdRyxzBbb2G7DbgPy1VV TBnSrKBoTBHFBTMWWd6PiFoGWmzQ3IhLrBlcBmhL9LlCrJ8vkVsLFocuBrh35uCKfi9Y Obgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fQAYlhBFmh7QYVHGXCM2VhU5hSckDPDO7qHrRxoBhi8=; b=hDI2os5QCGQPkrrOHD/EjvZzyd18KSsU6yFDb1Sw8LdiA3NpsBn7kaRgSQerqW937p 7CuCNO5GvQJiLJvQGTnF4gBZI4zMRuaN6oV0GL8WxfzfFXsxGbOlRky7tRK0vW1c1sa1 x0Jx7+z+/+YujqZ/UgUyLtvrlGtSL7Vomf/k1qyUVjuGTn7CL3ttnxScM4bNU883gvqK haaXgh2PXBWQ4pnEcWESV7W1XA19qRr64BPhDeikF1BI2cjf1eZYzVYnG+6CzKmYWt2N cMfL9u64RLODpaY76Pl742J0HemBggULpPcMHIRV1mM4QKOxAdxczFdyr3hsRGIAOUet WeAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL1CC1YTxqyzqG/16Q4ghgPnANOAk0EOCsf2hxQkzw2W9dpD6uci0fhHjv94LU14evYNVYgRamyXKMZdQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.200.147 with SMTP id t19mr1869505qkl.165.1481828599705; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:03:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.38.161 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:02:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF64408CE96@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <148169297159.10864.11213404330614218630.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAGnRvur3u6S0n1SJVX2DAe2LbzziiizNRF2up6zFjQvBvLRz2g@mail.gmail.com> <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF64408CE96@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 20:02:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGnRvurnUsoHL=fTQvVttBY6EfAxKHyBba+4sjRN_TyWR63LMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/Xkq_Zqp3XhKbMCRgHv2E_jG_eQI>
Cc: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-manet-dlep@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-manet-dlep@ietf.org>, "manet-chairs@ietf.org" <manet-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:03:29 -0000

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Suresh Krishnan
<suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:
> On 12/15/2016 03:56 AM, Henning Rogge wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Suresh Krishnan
>> <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> * Sections 11.2, 11.3, 11.9 and 11.10
>>> The IPv4 and IPv6 addresses do not seem to be aligned on word boundaries.
>>> Didn't you face any inefficiencies/difficulties due to this in your
>>> implementations (I saw there were four independent ones)?
>>
>> DLEP does not use any padding on single TLVs, so you must be able to
>> parse a TLS beginning on an unaligned address anyways.
>
> Thanks Henning. That makes sense. Any thoughts regarding my DISCUSS point?

You are right, there is one "line" too much for the MAC address, if we
remove it we get down to the 6/8 bytes we need.

Henning

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email