IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E870C129C07; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:56:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3-05k3Hy2OVy; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x243.google.com (mail-qk0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3FF9129B41; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id h201so6354070qke.3; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:56:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xRDgRL4kW6ayYy2joyGJToatfHBQN0CD2JZeCY2idQc=; b=OZbgC3A8D80i93A3siZn3vzwXsTt09KpxhjtDgU4/0W8j98gygpkx5rcQTRuLuyPQf TIyykDuEMd8M9QL/ZYGNc+y+c7pjI9KbiKEV5YpDISgsTkOxrGgAbyNUTnnaOagzvGaF XGXsZNos8QggdtGnBQbE77N3Iq8acMcPv/9LG3m91CBByFXIWxy54jVTR1k8XH1VTy7l u794V+E0ZNymG5WzxRgUj3CHOkUDjpvmFbE5/fYY6V0Ff8/XtiHXQpPiDgMI7Q3t9Xdd p6nWzLRX7sqXVu7Fa4nxqtUhatg2fVBFbAxjRhdOjG+lPx2ToEMEj0QlHlbPh24XYnnD zs7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xRDgRL4kW6ayYy2joyGJToatfHBQN0CD2JZeCY2idQc=; b=Fvi9LgrbA5xs2k1gryey40DhYJeSLY4gZUnbvhSqxvnZ4XmPUM9IrinnD3P6L3KOmd 1Z7F+ui5OlxoEv888zuuBMkDmLUyDMIi/ebeulDmS2oayMn+UUbeiNI3U3BIrOOIjAtZ P6ggtfiX54lUsXe76vp2IxJ0QylJAhTmZLllcIn5KzHqGTamCIz/D/RuokXqI18Gf7EW a9XawoiX4OIG5iqDpZSKjyFpIvAJTmLj+QfdrFKf9bXTlB9dV6OZthYlrZPlWMBnNgj7 xBxL5U88mBz9GPz398w1XITeLbHGPhBbJaTWT7Ey6CJvQilCODHMIGex05txcXzi9O1M D+jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKeZXfE60lpPbz3h8FdohqfZM6thMiHrPkdoVRZwZmx5tl/4Fae/MzeJoesadnMiMBx023zEY1h7ebCIA==
X-Received: by 10.55.174.135 with SMTP id x129mr194635qke.133.1481792167193; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:56:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.38.161 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:55:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <148169297159.10864.11213404330614218630.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148169297159.10864.11213404330614218630.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:55:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGnRvur3u6S0n1SJVX2DAe2LbzziiizNRF2up6zFjQvBvLRz2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/c9Vl_ix5nO9LMVp4qssEOwsu9QI>
Cc: MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-manet-dlep@ietf.org, manet-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-manet-dlep-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:56:12 -0000

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Suresh Krishnan
<suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * Sections 11.2, 11.3, 11.9 and 11.10
> The IPv4 and IPv6 addresses do not seem to be aligned on word boundaries.
> Didn't you face any inefficiencies/difficulties due to this in your
> implementations (I saw there were four independent ones)?

DLEP does not use any padding on single TLVs, so you must be able to
parse a TLS beginning on an unaligned address anyways.

Henning Rogge

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email