IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] MANET protocols in the community network as Funkfeuer.

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Sat, 13 October 2012 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC7821F8546 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_27=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWKOvVGZmavx for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0032A21F8533 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id fl11so4943760vcb.31 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lkxs0QSdKvWhbrVQJ4/oAgqjuvGsK7gf4tcwayGaL7w=; b=lWRxt6iawgrF6vbbcG3YWnzsujq2JlanDbbbGONAzUIuIs2tj21tF3pKQPxmzPE2rx 2TPBTduBPzRjxgzh4U0oC6ABukut7WWBpnQ6UF9DEvaYGi9ElguDHwIFlB7iuqbkgBBX Lo3rxJuwXi8ugSz+rvaLNrByROZPhT6HHxiFk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=lkxs0QSdKvWhbrVQJ4/oAgqjuvGsK7gf4tcwayGaL7w=; b=fssiC6ufsRu5DcYFmYcWO+dG/ImVo19COu3t0SpIeI73YT0FAuIaXgQjijdymQUKLS Y5TRkgyPGEgz3kGC68nN2EBpK0TUGKh7nmihjbn8d64s+TOXJ+6HNCTv0M4OL9aeU2kc AQt6Ins1kJuiH13pooSUJne9z/HNkwpQWjRByRMs9wbtCzZNdyPGtrep1+K9Tj0ydbuf o1sC3u7rX1dDQwDrc4QQE5PXG6oKeEIP6SMzORDZCx43yaEySILxiJjfLKUfxiyChS1+ 7Toar2HytefyW9zxgGVS557/DJxeYTl5f7mM1dKsSKz0B7C1x4PlardySlq8nEGoUE0i /VBQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.66.10 with SMTP id b10mr3419786vdt.71.1350142660320; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.94.103 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8_M_vVrpMyNZeLwAfQsqia=+E8p3YA-7B1azs5i9fJw4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnDZ8_M_vVrpMyNZeLwAfQsqia=+E8p3YA-7B1azs5i9fJw4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:37:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK=bVC9MV-6NHMMGUnE=-6ww9TBiTAyk-YqBDSJrWjH3FE-V5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3071cf1eaa1e5704cbf29541"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmuA6ufHqh5qxIo/Gxo2BQFE0mD7FXy3QmXr90a7TPCCilqsga5T/iuXJazetUHw6J0MAYZ
Cc: manet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] MANET protocols in the community network as Funkfeuer.
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 15:37:42 -0000

I think this draft is indeed interesting, and I wonder if there is any work
planned to continue it. It seems to be a bit of a mixture between
specifying how to use ETX in OLSRv2, and a deployment experience of ETX
with OLSR in the FunkFeuer network. Is that the right way to go forward, or
should that not better be separated in two drafts?

Ulrich

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Abdussalam Baryun <
abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think some people in WG are interested also in Funkfeuer routing
> metric [1], it was mentioned in MANET meeting 84. I hope we will see
> the draft [2] to be accepted as a MANET WG draft shortly for
> informational about Funkfeuer.
>
> AB>suggest for title>
> Packet Sequence Number based ETX Metric for Funkfeuer  Networking.
>
> AB> suggest the Abstract>
> This document specifies the ETX metric and its usage in Funkfeuer's
> OLSRv2 Routers.
>
> I recommend to include this draft [2] or a renewal in the Agenda 85,
> if the authors are welling to present it.
>
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg12077.html
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-funkfeuer-manet-olsrv2-etx-01
>
> AB
> ++
> On 10/12/12, Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > On 10/12/2012 09:53 AM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> It is an excellent draft/work, I support the draft and your process.
> >> Thanks to all: authors, you and the WG,
> >
> > The document will be a great help as a pointer for people who still
> > arguing the use of link metrics. Good to see it here.
> >
> > Henning Rogge
> >
> >
> > --
> > Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
> > Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
> > Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
> > Fraunhofer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
> > Telefon +49 228 9435-961,   Fax +49 228 9435 685
> > mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email