Re: [manet] MANET protocols in the community network as Funkfeuer.

Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com> Sat, 13 October 2012 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <hrogge@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F9221F844F for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.637
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.637 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.260, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_27=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gTGs6+DddzsS for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3951F21F843F for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id ro8so3840687pbb.31 for <manet@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GKpxrTNNm0E9L8SckW0azV5TDMX7Q/4oSNM+fRG5lDw=; b=A/sVqZSR8aVOBWBHPOwUyAGsuf5reA5MFqC0z+mj/KgFkLeXGouv7wlrXAOlAtH7z8 TK3ZXjICV9ghnttSJx8Qi3uavn0a/PNY+au3nwA27q81YLHJfTK5rN+l7qLD89lhpbnn 68y/HMgP5jRJu/9kri/uNTN7VWuFYn/OxI+7TrBQ7tGIK1JcP5GQLxG/JxwKbOgPG+K7 5F3lBDE9aOaL/lBudO1ot1GNAFNIl/FoAxtBRprvh805veM++G7yySux/qOhmnb2wQtx Lx447fi59tbZrmul+5iOUqkIU7d6RspmH9k8Q7IuFk2EYUxnu7sSgVTqgsMxnUK3TmlG ShQA==
Received: by 10.66.88.198 with SMTP id bi6mr21439907pab.23.1350163123695; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.134.43 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=bVC9MV-6NHMMGUnE=-6ww9TBiTAyk-YqBDSJrWjH3FE-V5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnDZ8_M_vVrpMyNZeLwAfQsqia=+E8p3YA-7B1azs5i9fJw4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAK=bVC9MV-6NHMMGUnE=-6ww9TBiTAyk-YqBDSJrWjH3FE-V5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Henning Rogge <hrogge@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 23:18:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGnRvuppa8H5hkPz7tMR7g3xMBTtRc9-6h_N_KVh=ySKp_8hoA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: manet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [manet] MANET protocols in the community network as Funkfeuer.
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 21:18:45 -0000

Interesting question... the last time we worked on the draft the
discussion bogged down with the question if this is the "right way" to
do ETX.

Maybe a split would be a good idea, we could have an informal document
specifying the strategy we are using at Freifunk/Funkfeuer for ETX.
And then we could work on how to transform this into a good OLSRv2
metric.

Henning Rogge

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> wrote:
> I think this draft is indeed interesting, and I wonder if there is any work
> planned to continue it. It seems to be a bit of a mixture between specifying
> how to use ETX in OLSRv2, and a deployment experience of ETX with OLSR in
> the FunkFeuer network. Is that the right way to go forward, or should that
> not better be separated in two drafts?
>
> Ulrich
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Abdussalam Baryun
> <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think some people in WG are interested also in Funkfeuer routing
>> metric [1], it was mentioned in MANET meeting 84. I hope we will see
>> the draft [2] to be accepted as a MANET WG draft shortly for
>> informational about Funkfeuer.
>>
>> AB>suggest for title>
>> Packet Sequence Number based ETX Metric for Funkfeuer  Networking.
>>
>> AB> suggest the Abstract>
>> This document specifies the ETX metric and its usage in Funkfeuer's
>> OLSRv2 Routers.
>>
>> I recommend to include this draft [2] or a renewal in the Agenda 85,
>> if the authors are welling to present it.
>>
>> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg12077.html
>> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-funkfeuer-manet-olsrv2-etx-01
>>
>> AB
>> ++
>> On 10/12/12, Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>> > On 10/12/2012 09:53 AM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> It is an excellent draft/work, I support the draft and your process.
>> >> Thanks to all: authors, you and the WG,
>> >
>> > The document will be a great help as a pointer for people who still
>> > arguing the use of link metrics. Good to see it here.
>> >
>> > Henning Rogge
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
>> > Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
>> > Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
>> > Fraunhofer Straße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany
>> > Telefon +49 228 9435-961,   Fax +49 228 9435 685
>> > mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> manet@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>



-- 
Steven Hawkings about cosmic inflation: "An increase of billions of
billions of percent in a tiny fraction of a second. Of course, that
was before the present government."