Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts
Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> Fri, 01 September 2017 06:17 UTC
Return-Path: <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3F8132D13 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 23:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <o64WSex3mikM>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam_report: ...that system for details.\n \n Content previ[...]
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o64WSex3mikM for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 23:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a.mx.fkie.fraunhofer.de (mailguard.fkie.fraunhofer.de [IPv6:2001:638:401:102:1aa9:5ff:fe5f:7f22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A03B132EB4 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 23:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufsun5.fkie.fraunhofer.de ([128.7.2.5] helo=mailhost.fkie.fraunhofer.de) by a.mx.fkie.fraunhofer.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>) id 1dnfGy-0000Ff-BB for manet@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:17:44 +0200
Received: from srv-mail-01.fkie.fraunhofer.de ([128.7.11.16] helo=srv-mail-01.gaia.fkie.fraunhofer.de) by mailhost.fkie.fraunhofer.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>) id 1dnfGy-0002eQ-8n for manet@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:17:44 +0200
Received: from [10.71.67.24] (128.7.89.212) by srv-mail-01.gaia.fkie.fraunhofer.de (128.7.11.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 08:17:41 +0200
To: manet@ietf.org
References: <1500890455.2721.234.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com> <1504171326.31980.2.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
From: Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <e7aa4a01-3eab-7625-26ed-49d2e43893e6@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:17:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1504171326.31980.2.camel@tropicalstormsoftware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [128.7.89.212]
X-ClientProxiedBy: srv-mail-02.gaia.fkie.fraunhofer.de (128.7.11.17) To srv-mail-01.gaia.fkie.fraunhofer.de (128.7.11.16)
X-Virus-Scanned: yes (ClamAV 0.99.2/23750/Fri Sep 1 06:39:59 2017) by a.mx.fkie.fraunhofer.de
X-Scan-Signature: 52e07e0af4405bded81fc5fcc507a670
X-Spam_score: -1.0
X-Spam_score_int: -9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mailguard.fkie.fraunhofer.de", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 31.08.2017 um 11:22 schrieb Rick Taylor: > Hi All, Okay, time to get the ball rolling for service discovery. I must admit I am not that happy with the draft in its current form. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Spam-ASN:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/nzbrlD_HQT0W4a_9bNTe8eb7lUo>
Subject: Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 06:17:52 -0000
Am 31.08.2017 um 11:22 schrieb Rick Taylor: > Hi All, Okay, time to get the ball rolling for service discovery. I must admit I am not that happy with the draft in its current form. First reason is the that the draft focuses on announcing router services to other routers. This makes it practically necessary to add an over the air component to DLEP. I thought we agreed that one of the design goals of DLEP was only to communicate between the local radio and the local router, exchanging already existing local knowledge. I think DLEP is the wrong protocol to exchange knowledge between routers and I am sure the IETF already has protocols for the two routers exchanging service information. What I had expected in this draft was a way for the radio to announce its LOCAL services to the router, e.g. a SIP endpoint to connect your routers VOIP network to a locally existing "push to talk" voice channel. Other examples would be to announce the existence of HTTP ip/port (configuration GUI) or a netconf/ssh port. The second (minor) issue I have with the draft is the text string used to identify the service. It feels a bit "out of place" in all the binary encoded data DLEP transfers. Henning Rogge -- Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE Kommunikationssysteme (KOM) Zanderstrasse 5, 53177 Bonn, Germany Telefon +49 228 50212-469 mailto:henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
- [manet] New DLEP drafts Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Henning Rogge
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Rick Taylor
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Stan Ratliff
- Re: [manet] New DLEP extension drafts Henning Rogge