Re: [manet] TLV naming draft

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 06 January 2015 05:34 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E51E1A1AC3 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 21:34:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZMpVu5RVoFVB for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 21:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74CE41A1A62 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 21:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f12so14535373qad.32 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:34:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ur/IeXIuOs622ekBEVbA0ZiBBZPxAK0c7koilQR6PeQ=; b=pNFP5NK3gK/X4gB9wsmwCQrd3LKRjgKbUOsn2XJup8kUxp29SUwPFLOnkfw57X00Du zhT4dt/mUvMKhmXd+RRaktaxQanBZeZcbSjx4iwu5WMTwHi2rrS9wkbk3s88Uuujb++Y r76xXkhxsOx6PdjZExDwWMFMnb7c4wmHBS3Fr/iOd5yM8pRbH92qv8SAvA2yZw278bjv /l6djvMcN269I4n1ZUIwDZOwVuyMEsN06i+Gs63qb1aeROPZYFlaADEjYGHmfN6lHXpm rGelCVnuJzK/P8TY8I67GPGYZOkEzwHuMLOHAAm381Z2WmQ8c37UY7ucT6DqKQans0xm qEsw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.12.135 with SMTP id x7mr122390822qax.62.1420522474668; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:34:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.86.178 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 21:34:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D40DF7405@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
References: <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D40DC38FB@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <CALtoyonSO70pK0+4GHNTn6pAnzsRQKw1f0VQ3LtwKUQcOxqQvw@mail.gmail.com> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D40DF7405@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:34:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-1C+VAKAMUdV4F-KwC925p7oDi3zbY9DP_8tAx3_Vpdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0129447c7f8ce8050bf529c3"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/xBDmYELrDpbCog0z3gJqBq824Hw
Cc: "manet@ietf.org" <manet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [manet] TLV naming draft
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 05:34:38 -0000

Happy new year,

Ok, thanks,

AB

On Monday, January 5, 2015, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <
chris.dearlove@baesystems.com> wrote:

> Happy New Year all,
>
> December having been a bit snowed under, I haven't got back to this. As
> this period is well passed, can I assume that we can reissue
> draft-dearlove-manet-tlv-naming as draft-ietf-manet-tlv-naming? As is our
> usual practice, this will be unchanged. (Were there any major issues we
> would do an -01 of the former first, but there aren't, I believe, even any
> minor issues raised.)
>
> Christopher
>
> --
> Christopher Dearlove
> Senior Principal Engineer, Information Assurance Group
> Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
> Tel: +44 1245 242194 |  Fax: +44 1245 242124
> chris.dearlove@baesystems.com <javascript:;> | http://www.baesystems.com
>
> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre,
> Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>
> From: Stan Ratliff [mailto:ratliffstan@gmail.com <javascript:;>]
> Sent: 20 November 2014 23:57
> To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
> Subject: Re: TLV naming draft
>
>
> *** WARNING ***
> This message originates from outside our organisation, either from an
> external partner or the internet.
> Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any
> attachments or reply.
> For information regarding Red Flags that you can look out for in emails
> you receive, click here.
> If you feel the email is suspicious, please follow this process.
> Working Group participants -
> As you can read below, the authors have asked for WG adoption for the TLV
> naming draft. Speaking as a WG participant, I support adoption. Speaking as
> co-chair - it's time to call for consensus. Given the holiday week in the
> U.S., we will hold this call for consensus open until Nov. 28. Unless there
> is significant opposition expressed here on the mailing list, the document
> will be accepted on that date.
>
> Please give us your opinions on the issue.
>
> Regards,
> Stan
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <
> chris.dearlove@baesystems.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> We would, as was said in Honolulu, like to request that
> draft-dearlove-manet-tlv-naming be adopted as a WG draft, and for the
> chairs to start this process.
>
> As also indicated, we will shortly thereafter be wanting to go to WGLC and
> onwards, but one step at a time.
>
> For those who may have missed it, this draft just tidies up some details
> of TLV naming, it has no actual impact on any protocol. However our AD has
> indicated that multitopology OLSRv2 (with the IESG for experimental status)
> won’t be able to proceed to RFC without this.
>
> Of course comments welcome on any points arising.
>
> --
> Christopher Dearlove
> Senior Principal Engineer, Information Assurance Group
> Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
> Tel: +44 1245 242194 |  Fax: +44 1245 242124
> chris.dearlove@baesystems.com <javascript:;> | http://www.baesystems.com
>
> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre,
> Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> manet@ietf.org <javascript:;>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>