Re: [Manycouches] one should not be using github, because it is on IPv4

[Behcet Sarikaya <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:14 AM Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I am not sure if manycouches is the right list for this.
> (what is a network protocol, and why would i care ?)
> Where do the IPv6 folks mostly flock together ... 6man ? Added.
>
> Too bad it's Corona times. We could have organized something like
> "Thursdays for IPv6" and rallyied in front of Github offices in San
> Francisco.
>


Github is owned by Microsoft, so maybe rally in Seattle :)


Behcet

>
> Why else would IETF go to San Francisco otherwise if not to partake in
> a good rally (IETF56:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20_March_2003_anti-war_protest)
>
> Of course, everything can be digitized:
>
> Find someone from ITF's gather.town team, get an outdoor area on
> gather.town
> with a street and a github office at the end. Have a protest rally for 30
> minutes next week, someone needs to show some presentation then in
> gather.town
> e.g.: showing how many companies already do use IPv6. We all come with our
> avatars, someone needs to screen record this, put it up on youtube, pass it
> to all the journalists you can find, so the youtube URL gets visibility.
>
> Didn't we already do something like this on gather.town ?
>
> Cheers
>     Toerless
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:21:14PM +0200, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> > more time passes more I think we should not be using github
> >
> > Github is, err, not disrespectful, not arrogant, but let us say
> > 'overlooking' my and others' requests of putting github on IPv6.  IPv6
> is no
> > longer the future of the Internet, but the current.  Somebody not on IPv6
> > risks of becoming invisible.
> >
> > At the same time, we insist in various places, including here, to use
> IPv4
> > and github.
> >
> > It is not normal.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> > Le 20/07/2021 à 22:53, Martin Duke a écrit :
> > > Hi Murray,
> > >
> > > "Facility" is now gone from the document, but I made a small addition
> in
> > > this PR.
> > > https://github.com/martinduke/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/pull/16
> > > <https://github.com/martinduke/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/pull/16
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the review.
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 2:38 PM Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
> > > <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> > >
> > >     Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> > >     draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05: No Objection
> > >
> > >     When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> all
> > >     email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this
> > >     introductory paragraph, however.)
> > >
> > >
> > >     Please refer to
> > >     https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > >     <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html>
> > >     for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> > >
> > >
> > >     The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > >     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/
> > >     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >     COMMENT:
> > >
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >     I suggest the shepherd writeup should have been sent back for
> > >     revision.  It
> > >     answers the first three questions (What is the status, why is this
> > >     the right
> > >     status, is it shown on the front page?) with just "BCP".  Also,
> > >     "N/A" is not an
> > >     appropriate answer to question 7.
> > >
> > >     Given the capitalization in Section 3.1, it appears some terms
> were also
> > >     imported from RFC 8718 (e.g., "Facility", which is formally defined
> > >     there).  We
> > >     might want to make it explicit that these definitions are imported.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Manycouches mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Manycouches mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches
>
> --
> ---
> [e-mail]
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [e-mail]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>