[Manycouches] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I suggest the shepherd writeup should have been sent back for revision.  It
answers the first three questions (What is the status, why is this the right
status, is it shown on the front page?) with just "BCP".  Also, "N/A" is not an
appropriate answer to question 7.

Given the capitalization in Section 3.1, it appears some terms were also
imported from RFC 8718 (e.g., "Facility", which is formally defined there).  We
might want to make it explicit that these definitions are imported.