Re: [marf] New Version Notification for draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback-00.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sun, 29 May 2011 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D2BE0684 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.195, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NKtrV7pC7OLm for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCCFE0657 for <marf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so1577813gwb.31 for <marf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EPFVAfovio14YHm8k7YLfPTd58cdU83kgXUMD/W0qSI=; b=I74Gqh58KffcvPmbINunn1P2LzMtTKMYmAUAr03vmxvSynvU7pKfqL+EuUwVplANqb 0tIW+ULpn9+Ul/dueo0LLgjX3g+YbTY+h0I8WQmLHP6iZshfobhcuMMDLlC4dduqfT31 Pu5mlkM+NIGPx1nhwHFPzw51pXzYJHSllhA1A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OowTGRePEOLC9X5yIC2athIeEuhnzMEZITYLKIyt+M+G3QkXrA11W+tqISKVKOu0tT 5X/PMA0XWgoCxt3TiFQyujczwsrNfHgVsNsh3lWD9JmAXZJT5PMtXsMF3XZHvRmL4Ppc aGi+T/Rnd0G0CZczQ7dhpaH2AiGto2pqrx8kE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.146.159.34 with SMTP id h34mr3107605yae.24.1306632808607; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.99.12 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 18:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8F170FBC-489E-448C-8DFC-7EF0B9578A5E@paypal-inc.com>
References: <20110513174637.20348.26696.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BANLkTikyr7t7vX9D-a3ch+iiTE6j+rmV5g@mail.gmail.com> <8F170FBC-489E-448C-8DFC-7EF0B9578A5E@paypal-inc.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:33:28 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QJZ-IlxlT0TY5QIRrJRTRcUEwA4
Message-ID: <BANLkTimEKzfk44bw6hu9OG88SoV7z4jQYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <marf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [marf] New Version Notification for draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback-00.txt
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:33:29 -0000

Thanks, folks, for the comments.

Steve: It is intended for use across boundaries, and can certainly be
used internally as well.  It's intended for exactly the same use that
the base MARF report types are.

Alessandro and JD: Yes, there's certainly the case that "not-spam"
reports can't be just taken at face value if that would cause them to
affect the filtering for other users.  We'll put some more into the
next version of the draft to make that more explicit.  I don't think
we want to change the name of the report, though -- just the
documentation.

Brett: Yes, I'm always happy to change or add examples, and I
generally believe that more examples improve most documents.  I'll
change the example, or add a new one (or ones), as you suggest.

I'll have a chair chat with Murray, and then post a new version at his
direction.

Barry