Re: [marf] New Version Notification for draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback-00.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Fri, 13 May 2011 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3783AE082F for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xslORupZtqYG for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C4BE081A for <marf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:59:44 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <marf@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:59:43 -0700
Thread-Topic: [marf] New Version Notification for draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcwRlzCYVyH7Z3L3Q6+BgGvWfdIQJQAAC1uQ
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134331A4BE@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20110513174637.20348.26696.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BANLkTikyr7t7vX9D-a3ch+iiTE6j+rmV5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikyr7t7vX9D-a3ch+iiTE6j+rmV5g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [marf] New Version Notification for draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback-00.txt
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:59:45 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: marf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:marf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 10:57 AM
> To: Message Abuse Report Format working group
> Subject: Re: [marf] New Version Notification for draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback-00.txt
> 
> Kepeng Li and I have just submitted a draft for consideration by the
> MARF working group:
> [...]
> As noted in the draft the requirement for this comes from the OMA
> SpamRep folks, and also seems like a reasonable need in general.  We'd
> like the MARF working group to review this, and to consider adopting
> it.  It seems like an easy ride, I think.

Seems appropriate given our chartered task remain in line with SpamRep and seek consolidation.  I think it's appropriate to bring it into the WG.

-MSK [as participant]