IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [marf] New Version Notification for draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback-00.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 13 May 2011 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A6AE07E1 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.058
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.058 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n2NLqxuRsYqJ for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE46E082D for <marf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so1210863gwb.31 for <marf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h54Op9K4283u/Oa6cZkaEnM1JNNYIneD63fAACmnhLg=; b=axhNsS49InzYU2ofPjEzZxBfSZfs64JMPHfs/fDLvW/4n80P5eYejNAx+VOqrA6X0T 95On47WmqCysjzaH6CyJlcctQAgtYL/zovtDOatJt3aU8Xfqou/OEITmtZzngRuZXHKi lqbmzy72Mxu8gLZzW2TyFquwWbmhAarYzV8zE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=p3EZo4/lEJWpYj8twsz9nw5D6nyK29Cw4arBkRgCuXFZOsFhySk5hteThXj8Z9UwN/ 1gr4bqLQUUW0GsgI6JfTB0FfNSrZS+u4HAasbG0U2uqCi9j25Zrz9Q/k1NeEGgz6kDSf Cm8uR/UZNzVO/9XW/1T42MLoedKfe46q9mb70=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.180.227 with SMTP id j63mr1756262yhm.213.1305309426344; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.236.108.49 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110513174637.20348.26696.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20110513174637.20348.26696.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 13:57:06 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: PN_1mOe-lcVlDAOAGQkvo0kdzf0
Message-ID: <BANLkTikyr7t7vX9D-a3ch+iiTE6j+rmV5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Message Abuse Report Format working group <marf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [marf] New Version Notification for draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback-00.txt
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:57:07 -0000

Kepeng Li and I have just submitted a draft for consideration by the
MARF working group:

> Filename:        draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback
> Revision:        00
> Title:           Email Feedback Report Type Value : not-spam
> Creation date:   2011-05-13
> WG ID:           Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 7
>
> Abstract:
>   This document defines a new Abuse Reporting Format (ARF) feedback
>   report type value: "not-spam".  It can be used to indicate that a
>   message that was tagged or categorized as spam (such as by an ISP) in
>   fact is not spam.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-marf-not-spam-feedback

As noted in the draft the requirement for this comes from the OMA
SpamRep folks, and also seems like a reasonable need in general.  We'd
like the MARF working group to review this, and to consider adopting
it.  It seems like an easy ride, I think.

Murray will handle all chair responsibilities for this if it's
adopted, since I'm a co-author.

Barry, as participant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email