[marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (7091)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 16 August 2022 09:11 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: marf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA23C15A722 for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 02:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WqYncI0QsSbh for <marf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 02:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DCE6C14F727 for <marf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 02:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 340A44C29A; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 02:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: vesely@tana.it, ietf@shaftek.org, standards@taugh.com, msk@cloudmark.com, marf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220816091143.340A44C29A@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 02:11:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marf/LmlkOCSOIjcdn7CixVlBGQocviU>
Subject: [marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (7091)
X-BeenThere: marf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Message Abuse Report Format working group discussion list <marf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/marf/>
List-Post: <mailto:marf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf>, <mailto:marf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:11:47 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5965,
"An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7091

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>

Section: 2

Original Text
-------------
   e.  Except as discussed below, each feedback report MUST be related
       to only a single email message.  Summary and aggregate formats
       are outside of the scope of this specification.


Corrected Text
--------------
   e.  Except when using the Incidents field (see below),
       each feedback report MUST be related
       to only a single email message.  Summary and aggregate formats
       are outside of the scope of this specification.


Notes
-----
There doesn't seem to be another discussion of similarity.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
Publication Date    : August 2010
Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
Area                : Applications
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG