Re: [marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (7091)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 03 February 2024 00:28 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220816091143.340A44C29A@rfcpa.amsl.com> <0626b0f3-d773-3c44-07b1-784a6089d5aa@taugh.com> <AAE9D5BF-1843-4B42-8410-5B24B48C4791@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <AAE9D5BF-1843-4B42-8410-5B24B48C4791@amsl.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 16:28:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZLLE6YRKMgtbDUZkpUuCi-Yz+n89EH3p7-PL0+ZKLtpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
Cc: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, orie@transmute.industries, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, vesely@tana.it, ietf@shaftek.org, standards@taugh.com, marf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dc824f06106f4f47"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/marf/_RZD2Qa2BaBRhCBQFcNyIycDGS0>
Subject: Re: [marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (7091)
Precedence: list

Done.  Sorry for missing this when it came through originally.

-MSK

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 12:55 PM Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
wrote:

> Hi Murray, Francesca, and Orie,
>
> We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as
> editorial, so we changed the Type to “Technical”. As Stream Approver,
> please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions
> at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).
>
> Please see John Levine’s email below.
>
> You may review the report at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7091
>
> Information on how to verify errata reports can be found at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/
>
> Further information on errata can be found at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php
>
> Thank you.
>
> RFC Editor/rv
>
>
> > On Aug 16, 2022, at 7:46 AM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please reject this.  Each report is about a single message even if the
> incidents field says it's related to others.
> >
> > R's,
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, RFC Errata System wrote:
> >
> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5965,
> >> "An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports".
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> You may review the report below and at:
> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7091
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Type: Editorial
> >> Reported by: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
> >>
> >> Section: 2
> >>
> >> Original Text
> >> -------------
> >>  e.  Except as discussed below, each feedback report MUST be related
> >>      to only a single email message.  Summary and aggregate formats
> >>      are outside of the scope of this specification.
> >>
> >>
> >> Corrected Text
> >> --------------
> >>  e.  Except when using the Incidents field (see below),
> >>      each feedback report MUST be related
> >>      to only a single email message.  Summary and aggregate formats
> >>      are outside of the scope of this specification.
> >>
> >>
> >> Notes
> >> -----
> >> There doesn't seem to be another discussion of similarity.
> >>
> >> Instructions:
> >> -------------
> >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06)
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Title               : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
> >> Publication Date    : August 2010
> >> Author(s)           : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy
> >> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> >> Source              : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format
> >> Area                : Applications
> >> Stream              : IETF
> >> Verifying Party     : IESG
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Regards,
> > John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
> https://jl.ly
> >
>
>

[marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (7091) RFC Errata System
Re: [marf] [taugh.com-standards] [Editorial Errat… John R Levine
Re: [marf] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5965 (7… Murray S. Kucherawy