IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 23 May 2012 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC80021F8499 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zq5NMfO3wI7S for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og105.obsmtp.com (exprod7og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D8621F8497 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob105.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT7zkDChIUFwhTKmA1cbeYK4oSogtllTe@postini.com; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:20:15 PDT
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:18:39 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Wed, 23 May 2012 09:18:38 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:18:37 -0400
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
Thread-Index: Ac045HkKxuOSOPwVQJW4WyOEfL7CbQAADXvwAAAtquAAAEaNMA==
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76C03F356@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <mailman.1297.1337778214.3389.mboned@ietf.org> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76C03F330@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E2B9B5489@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E2B9B5489@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:20:17 -0000

Please do.

          Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> [mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:15 AM
> To: Ronald Bonica; mboned@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-
> address-format-02.txt
> 
> Dear Ron,
> 
> My read of the messages exchanged in 6man (archives available here
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg15857.html) is
> there is no strong opinion to abandon the current design in favour of
> using the remaining flag.
> 
> I can sent an e-mail to 6man if you suggest so.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> >-----Message d'origine-----
> >De : mboned-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces@ietf.org] De la
> >part de Ronald Bonica Envoyé : mercredi 23 mai 2012 15:09 À :
> >mboned@ietf.org Objet : Re: [MBONED] I-D Action:
> >draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
> >
> >Hi Med,
> >
> >Thanks for posting this draft. Do you think that this draft version
> >addresses all of the comments from 6man? If so, you might want to post
> >a similar message to the 6man mailing list.
> >
> >                                          Ron
> >
> >
> >> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 15:03:25 +0200
> >> From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
> >> To: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [MBONED] I-D Action:
> >> 	draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
> >> Message-ID:
> >>
> ><94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E2B9B547E@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.fra
> >> ncetelecom.fr>
> >>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> An updated version taking into account the comments received
> >during the
> >> IETF LC has been submitted:
> >>
> >> * Editorial changes as suggested in SM's review
> >> * Title change (comment from C. Bormann)
> >> * Added a new section to describe the algorithm to embed/extract the
> >> IPv4 address (comment from C. Bormann)
> >> * Added some pointers to documents making use of the address format
> >> (comment from C. Bormann)
> >> * Added an appendix to explain why an M-bit is needed
> >(comment from C.
> >> Bormann)
> >> * Added an appendix to explain why an address format is needed
> >> (comment from C. Bormann)
> >> * Added examples of means to provision the MPREFIX64
> >(comment from C.
> >> Bormann)
> >>
> >> Diff from previous version:
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-
> >> address-format-02
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Med
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >MBONED mailing list
> >MBONED@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email