IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 23 May 2012 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE43521F875C for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zkPlz233dH-k for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og109.obsmtp.com (exprod7og109.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB6721F875B for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob109.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT7zhj1BpXYE2w0mhWsVvN2+3JGOWfRNF@postini.com; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:09:36 PDT
Received: from P-CLDFE01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:09:10 -0700
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by p-cldfe01-hq.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:09:10 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Wed, 23 May 2012 09:09:09 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:09:08 -0400
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
Thread-Index: Ac045HkKxuOSOPwVQJW4WyOEfL7CbQAADXvw
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76C03F330@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <mailman.1297.1337778214.3389.mboned@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1297.1337778214.3389.mboned@ietf.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:09:37 -0000

Hi Med,

Thanks for posting this draft. Do you think that this draft version addresses all of the comments from 6man? If so, you might want to post a similar message to the 6man mailing list. 

                                          Ron


> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 15:03:25 +0200
> From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
> To: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [MBONED] I-D Action:
> 	draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
> Message-ID:
> 	<94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E2B9B547E@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.fra
> ncetelecom.fr>
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> An updated version taking into account the comments received during the
> IETF LC has been submitted:
> 
> * Editorial changes as suggested in SM's review
> * Title change (comment from C. Bormann)
> * Added a new section to describe the algorithm to embed/extract the
> IPv4 address (comment from C. Bormann)
> * Added some pointers to documents making use of the address format
> (comment from C. Bormann)
> * Added an appendix to explain why an M-bit is needed (comment from C.
> Bormann)
> * Added an appendix to explain why an address format is needed
> (comment from C. Bormann)
> * Added examples of means to provision the MPREFIX64  (comment from C.
> Bormann)
> 
> Diff from previous version:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-
> address-format-02
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email