IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Wed, 23 May 2012 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA9621F853C for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2orMh-t9f+8k for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED85E21F84FF for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 06:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 623FE32464E; Wed, 23 May 2012 15:15:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from puexch91.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.48]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4982123804B; Wed, 23 May 2012 15:15:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.9]) by puexch91.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.48]) with mapi; Wed, 23 May 2012 15:15:21 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 15:15:20 +0200
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
Thread-Index: Ac045HkKxuOSOPwVQJW4WyOEfL7CbQAADXvwAAAtquA=
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E2B9B5489@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <mailman.1297.1337778214.3389.mboned@ietf.org> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76C03F330@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76C03F330@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.5.23.113319
Subject: Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:15:23 -0000

Dear Ron,

My read of the messages exchanged in 6man (archives available here http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg15857.html) is there is no strong opinion to abandon the current design in favour of using the remaining flag. 

I can sent an e-mail to 6man if you suggest so.

Cheers,
Med

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : mboned-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces@ietf.org] 
>De la part de Ronald Bonica
>Envoyé : mercredi 23 mai 2012 15:09
>À : mboned@ietf.org
>Objet : Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: 
>draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
>
>Hi Med,
>
>Thanks for posting this draft. Do you think that this draft 
>version addresses all of the comments from 6man? If so, you 
>might want to post a similar message to the 6man mailing list. 
>
>                                          Ron
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 15:03:25 +0200
>> From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
>> To: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [MBONED] I-D Action:
>> 	draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-02.txt
>> Message-ID:
>> 	
><94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E2B9B547E@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.fra
>> ncetelecom.fr>
>> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> An updated version taking into account the comments received 
>during the
>> IETF LC has been submitted:
>> 
>> * Editorial changes as suggested in SM's review
>> * Title change (comment from C. Bormann)
>> * Added a new section to describe the algorithm to embed/extract the
>> IPv4 address (comment from C. Bormann)
>> * Added some pointers to documents making use of the address format
>> (comment from C. Bormann)
>> * Added an appendix to explain why an M-bit is needed 
>(comment from C.
>> Bormann)
>> * Added an appendix to explain why an address format is needed
>> (comment from C. Bormann)
>> * Added examples of means to provision the MPREFIX64  
>(comment from C.
>> Bormann)
>> 
>> Diff from previous version:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-
>> address-format-02
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Med
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>MBONED mailing list
>MBONED@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email