Re: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization

"Zhouqian (Cathy)" <cathy.zhou@huawei.com> Fri, 23 March 2012 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <cathy.zhou@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD8121E8041 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VksVJKNelfIv for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B632821F84A6 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AEH84751; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:32:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:31:28 -0700
Received: from SZXEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.32) by dfweml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:31:34 -0700
Received: from SZXEML527-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.183]) by szxeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:31:26 +0800
From: "Zhouqian (Cathy)" <cathy.zhou@huawei.com>
To: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
Thread-Index: Ac0B9w89Uun9M1/TTc6mIlfsWKf7WQDuPgAQAAsd9DAAIeWOoAAFndsAAC14mpAAQ1NRgAAUtwfw//+MEgD//3mSgA==
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:31:25 +0000
Message-ID: <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF1BDBE219@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF1BDBE15D@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CB9150FE.1E5D8%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <CB9150FE.1E5D8%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.70.39.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:32:29 -0000

Hi Yiu,
This solution is not only for transition, it also covers the pure v6 case.
About the content stream, there will be only one stream received by MTR because MTR makes comparison.
If the path metric of v4 source> path metric of v6 source, the MTR will choose the path of v6 source. Otherwise, it will choose v4 source. 
If the v4 metric=v6 metric, it will choose one of them.

Best Regards,
Cathy ZHOU


-----Original Message-----
From: Lee, Yiu [mailto:Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 10:07 AM
To: Zhouqian (Cathy); Stig Venaas
Cc: mboned@ietf.org; Ronald Bonica
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization

Hi Cathy,

I am a little confused. Since MTR is for transitioning, why will it
connect to the S6 in the first place? Besides, say you have two types of
receivers (v4 and v6) connected to the v6-only network. At any given time,
there are v4 and v6 receivers watching TV. In this setup, you will have to
stream the content twice anyway because the group address will be
different for native-v6 (v6 source) and v4-embedded v6 (v4 source). Did I
get this wrong?

Thanks,
Yiu


On 3/22/12 9:50 PM, "Zhouqian (Cathy)" <cathy.zhou@huawei.com> wrote:

>There are two cases in Figure 1. One is v6 network connecting to both v4
>and v6 sources via MTR, which is in higher priority and is the main case
>of this document.