Re: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 21 March 2012 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB70C21F84AF for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.411, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_BACKHAIR_11=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oh8EIIqpASaB for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com (exprod7og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8DE21F86DA for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT2ntzqtClFv62pVpk2ArwfG4mmHaOm9I@postini.com; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:03:43 PDT
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:01:32 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:01:31 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "Zhouqian (Cathy)" <cathy.zhou@huawei.com>, "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:01:29 -0400
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
Thread-Index: Ac0B9w89Uun9M1/TTc6mIlfsWKf7WQDuPgAQAAsd9DAAIeWOoAAX8UGgABz3rRAADuP0wA==
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76880739A@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D7683E5E26@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF1BDB6A63@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D768638094@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF1BDBCFFA@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76874604A@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF1BDBD7CC@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <A6A061BEE5DDC94A9692D9D81AF776DF1BDBD7CC@szxeml527-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:03:45 -0000

Cathy,

If you divorce the problem of path optimization from the problem of v6 transition, it might be worthwhile to ask the WG if there is interest.

                                             Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhouqian (Cathy) [mailto:cathy.zhou@huawei.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 4:06 AM
> To: Ronald Bonica; mboned@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
> 
> Hi Ron,
> How about we changing the title to "Multicast path optimization in IPv4
> and IPv6 networks"?
> In fact, this problem not only exists in the translator case, but also
> in the pure IPv6 case.
> As I replied to Stig's comments, this idea comes from RFC4601, which
> talks about IPv4 case.
> We hope to solve similar problems in both translator and pure IPv6
> cases.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Cathy ZHOU
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:rbonica@juniper.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:23 AM
> To: Cathy Zhou(Qian); mboned@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
> 
> Cathy,
> 
> It seems wrong to use the words "transition" and "optimization" in the
> same sentence. By definition, any investment in a transition technology
> is a "throw away" investment. Once the transition is complete, the
> investment yields no return.
> 
> Do we really want to optimize a technology that:
> 
> - has not yet been fully specified
> - has not yet seen any deployment
> - should be decommissioned as soon as possible
> 
>                                            Ron
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cathy Zhou(Qian) [mailto:cathy.zhou@huawei.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:27 AM
> > To: Ronald Bonica; mboned@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
> >
> > Hi Ron,
> > It is possible to deploy and configure AFs to solve the problem. The
> > IPv6 router and IPv4 router mentioned in this document could be AFs.
> > But in the current AF document, the address translation and v4/v6
> > interworking are mainly discussed. Routing issues are not considered
> > yet.
> > Our document proposed a possible way to solve such routing related
> > problems.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Cathy ZHOU
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:rbonica@juniper.net]
> > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:39 PM
> > To: Cathy Zhou(Qian); mboned@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
> >
> > Hi Cathy,
> >
> > At this point, can you tell me for certain that it is impossible to
> > deploy and configure AFs in a manner that will prevent the problems
> > that you are attempting to solve?
> >
> >                                                Ron
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Cathy Zhou(Qian) [mailto:cathy.zhou@huawei.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 5:18 AM
> > > To: Ronald Bonica; mboned@ietf.org
> > > Subject: RE: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
> > >
> > > Which AF behavior will pre-empt the entire issue?
> > > AF function defines v4-v6 interworking, but this draft does not
> > depend
> > > on how AF functions. It can be applied in all transition cases
> > > involving 4<->6 conversion.
> > > So I think it can be processed in parallel with AF function
> > definition.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Cathy ZHOU
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mboned-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Ronald Bonica
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:28 PM
> > > To: mboned@ietf.org
> > > Subject: [MBONED] draft-zhou-mboned-multrans-path-optimization
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Is it appropriate to address the problems raised by draft-zhou-
> > mboned-
> > > multrans-path-optimization before the AF function has been defined?
> > > I could imagine at least one AF behavior that would pre-empt the
> > > entire issue.
> > >
> > > --------------------
> > > Ron Bonica
> > > //speaking as individual contributor
> > > vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MBONED mailing list
> > > MBONED@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned