Re: [mdnsext] dnssdext BoF in Berlin

"Townsley.net" <mark@townsley.net> Sat, 22 June 2013 07:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@townsley.net>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C537B21F9DB2 for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.591
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.591 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.988, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8eN6DIRELwi for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F065821F9D9D for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p58so6869974wes.40 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to:x-gm-message-state; bh=Rk+a10E84GAR8mVJ8eWZLxOKJwm+mSGQGxVan8aN98c=; b=YP0SLoM1J18ivTm2EOP5Gm3bvM80MlHoZG32pPlc4UvnETtPbfv7xaOHh1j2ddX1Q1 4lQ2IZj5jFIgXToMxMQJAp7LrXSwdpqMS8+Gucbalwb+dOVXoBFafQKUafF+c76LINUk RYYO2JSDKbEyFXJRmR9bmV/tZNYUGhump2SkjwIWSBuNcunsJ4krZXZ9gBHnbvxJUQ3K zZJfE0RXgn3i5cuSo8NfFHB472VXn0PIGPDr4FY6DxhqDlxgf5mUQPiNsZnWTGHzBmNU v6GGFKE08mX7jyt2Je6F3z14SKew2TgIGvvT3AP5MgySCXJ3H+3kd+XYPmFc4PNsaOew AgHw==
X-Received: by 10.194.104.74 with SMTP id gc10mr11290042wjb.48.1371884957780; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.55.23.164] (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xn20sm2079329wib.5.2013.06.22.00.09.16 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20130620183604.563.97531.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <352651CB-88BF-4877-82A2-280CBCDF8AE8@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <352651CB-88BF-4877-82A2-280CBCDF8AE8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ECA793C8-F806-40B7-BE71-82369FCAFCDC@townsley.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329)
From: "Townsley.net" <mark@townsley.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:09:17 +0200
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUXGWOdlS78Wmi4noa2pmsfI6yC9FhzYMpBXIyupi54NHSfD/Wo4o5q6604ivHdsz3G/Qh
Cc: "mdnsext@ietf.org" <mdnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] dnssdext BoF in Berlin
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 07:09:19 -0000

Please add homenet to the list of WGs to avoid. 

- Mark

(Thumbtyped)

On 21 juin 2013, at 19:52, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> The request for a dnssdext BoF in Berlin has been approved by the IESG.  The BoF logistics are included below.  Note the name of the BoF is dnssdext, not sdnssd.  The BoF will be scheduled in the IETF-87 agenda along with other BoFs and WG meetings, so we'll know the date and time of the meeting as soon as the agenda is completed.
> 
> Please review the information below and reply with questions or suggested updates.  In particular, are there any other WG/BoF sessions that should be be listed as "Conflicts to Avoid"?  I've already sent in a request to drop "intarea" from the explicit list and add a special request to avoid conflicts with all INT area WG sessions.
> 
> - Ralph
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" <session_request_developers@ietf.org>
>> Subject: dnssdext - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 87
>> Date: June 20, 2013 2:36:04 PM EDT
>> To: session-request@ietf.org
>> Cc: dnssdext-ads@tools.ietf.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk, cmorgan@amsl.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Cindy Morgan, on behalf of the dnssdext working group.
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> Working Group Name: DNS-SD Extensions
>> Area Name: Internet Area
>> Session Requester: Cindy Morgan
>> 
>> Number of Sessions: 1
>> Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
>> Number of Attendees: 150
>> Conflicts to Avoid: 
>> First Priority: intarea, dnsop, v6ops, appsawg 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Special Requests:
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mdnsext mailing list
> mdnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext