Re: [mdnsext] dnssdext charter

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 28 August 2013 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1DA21F992B for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fPW5eeQrkHhy for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x236.google.com (mail-pb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1094E21F9926 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ro12so6827920pbb.27 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=QBC6n4zWgovR8EJ6AN0EwztVMPsMul07bclwE6hzIrs=; b=KtNbeMK8sh22DytC0MJAIT2IUquj6ML7N6xZ0pc4huifh4u0L3ukTkta0pVRPIjsjK foZ1FjVif3d+7CQnvwwoqpvBx58ovHgbwN4UWra0FXQV4JSeYKhlz6PesO2yUaV6DF0o QhS3ArWTqF7yaMuTXu9MoEbtdxiqdSw7G1LxDc56OoC4L9yJdDkLBFbbKLrGJPQpAuSQ BakKdw5MSUzOOskI5C29wHOWPnaa2KugJp9sBHJRKBNrIzalInMbor2YCSjcFh9VKrWl luKcnHt5vzw3qpIaIBR3wCsGjwGZRPT6pzRMqM73FuDpoyRpEVNSzmDme7XKlGtABSU/ +S9g==
X-Received: by 10.68.200.100 with SMTP id jr4mr146852pbc.0.1377727473633; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.155.32.26] (128-107-239-235.cisco.com. [128.107.239.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mz5sm33457848pbc.18.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130828144342.0c80fd88@resistor.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:04:30 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <07C9AD16-1FDA-4FE7-A09C-69324CFF005B@gmail.com>
References: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA301ABFCB8@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> <f083fbd79348a50cda89656bb4ca1632@xs4all.nl> <CABOxzu1XsFn838putfXTmy0=8jfdsZuSb5=kL9--cg0mHs9RZA@mail.gmail.com> <D9B9F172-207C-4D90-AA6B-5DF14EE81A0D@gmail.com> <E36F274013087B4EA05E08EB503750390BE3A6B4@DENBGAT9EK1MSX.ww902.siemens.net> <9B02E320-7496-4230-BE86-A9003ABB359B@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|9918d88d5296d895217f3769a4167892p7R9iD03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|9B02E320-7496-4230-BE86-A9003ABB359B@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <6.2.5.6.2.20130828015008.0bf9e810@resistor.net> <52BE61DF-4677-4576-B501-C0EE42A94A22@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|b49467b60dedbd0bb02996c906917987p7RAie03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|52BE61DF-4677-4576-B501-C0EE42A94A22@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <6.2.5.6.2.20130828144342.0c80fd88@resistor.net>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "mdnsext@ietf.org mdnsext" <mdnsext@ietf.org>, Chown Tim <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] dnssdext charter
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:04:35 -0000

On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:47 PM 8/28/13, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> At 02:44 28-08-2013, Tim Chown wrote:
>> If candidate WGs were treated the same way as real WGs within the tools system, related drafts could presumably also be automatically listed, for example?
> 
> The IETF will end up having side-working groups.  It's not a good idea in my opinion. :-)

Suppose the instantiation of these candidate WGs were constrained with an expiration date?

- Ralph

> 
> Regards,
> -sm 
> _______________________________________________
> mdnsext mailing list
> mdnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext