Re: [MEDIACTRL] draft-ietf-mediactrl-mixer-control-package-11 error in examples in section 4.2.3

More fundamental question: Why do we have reason text at all?

One of the DISCUSSes from the ADs is that if we have human-readable text, it has to have a language indicator.

If the Reason Comment is not human readable, then we do not need it.

What would be the opinion of the WG to drop reason / comment text everywhere? Or, to keep with HTTP, to have fixed reason strings? Or, to keep with XML, we just say that the string gets interpreted in whatever locale the XML gets interpreted?

On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:29 AM, McGlashan, Scott wrote:

> thanks - I'll fix them.
> 
> Scott
> 
> On 4 Jun 2010, at 19:04, Stéphane Bastien wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In draft-ietf-mediactrl-mixer-control-package-11, there are errors in the examples in section 4.2.3 <response>.
> 
> The examples are:
> 
> <response code="200">
>    <reason>Success</reason>
>   </response>
> 
> 
> <response code="403">
> 
>    <reason>Conf already exists</reason>
> 
>   </response>
> 
> 
> But I believe they should show:
> 
> 
> <response status="200" reason="conference created" />
> 
> 
> 
> <response status="405" reason="Conference already exists" />
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> <ATT00001..txt>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEDIACTRL mailing list
> MEDIACTRL@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl
> Supplemental Web Site:
> http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl