Re: Recursive look up of base in outer headers

Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se> Wed, 03 September 1997 11:13 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa04423; 3 Sep 97 7:13 EDT
Received: from services.bunyip.com (services.Bunyip.Com [192.77.55.2]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid HAA28055; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 07:16:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA12751 for uri-out; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 06:54:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA12744 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 06:54:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA22541 for uri@services; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 06:51:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ester.dsv.su.se (ester.dsv.su.se [130.237.161.10]) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA22538 for <uri@Bunyip.Com>; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 06:51:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [130.237.150.138] (jph1.dsv.su.se [130.237.150.138]) by ester.dsv.su.se (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id MAA12427; Wed, 3 Sep 1997 12:54:10 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <v03110702b0326a2b4fe3@[130.237.150.138]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.95.970902174216.18545F-100000@xochi.tezcat.com>
References: <199709022100.RAA03064@access4.digex.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 03:15:33 +0200
To: Klaus Weide <kweide@tezcat.com>, Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
From: Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se>
Subject: Re: Recursive look up of base in outer headers
Cc: mhtml@segate.sunet.se, uri@bunyip.com
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

At 17.47 -0500 97-09-02, Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 1997, Al Gilman wrote:
> > Particularly, if the same Content-Base + Content-Location value
> > pair are at risk of being interpreted one way when transmitted
> > in MIME and another way when transmitted via HTTP I see this as
> > a likely source of trouble and too arcane for prime time.
>
> I agree with this, though.  But I don't think anybody disagrees.

The MHTML standard says that the order of headers within the same Content-
Heading has no effect on the interpretation of the headers (in the case
of the headers Content-Base and Content-Location). From what you say,
there does not seem to be any reason to change this.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme