Re: Recursive look up of base in outer headers

Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se> Tue, 02 September 1997 19:43 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa21184; 2 Sep 97 15:43 EDT
Received: from services.bunyip.com (services.Bunyip.Com [192.77.55.2]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTPid PAA25137; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 15:46:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA27754 for uri-out; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 15:24:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com [192.197.208.1]) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA27749 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 15:24:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA19381 for uri@services; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 15:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ester.dsv.su.se (ester.dsv.su.se [130.237.161.10]) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19378 for <uri@Bunyip.Com>; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 15:22:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [130.237.150.138] (jph1.dsv.su.se [130.237.150.138]) by ester.dsv.su.se (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id VAA09301; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 21:24:31 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <v03110700b031e7c5aae8@[130.237.158.12]>
In-Reply-To: <199709011446.KAA01746@access2.digex.net>
References: <v03007811b03029e30580@[130.237.150.138]> from Jacob Palme at "Sep 1, 97 10:26:01 am"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 17:58:53 +0200
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
From: Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se>
Subject: Re: Recursive look up of base in outer headers
Cc: mhtml@segate.sunet.se, uri@bunyip.com
Sender: owner-uri@bunyip.com
Precedence: bulk

At 10.46 -0400 97-09-01, Al Gilman wrote:
> Content-Location and Content-Base attributes are
> equivalent in this rule application; they both imply a BASE in
> the context of HTML documents within the associated MIME part
> hierarchy scopes.  Neither attribute has priority by reason of
> whether it is a base or location indication.  However, within the
> class of attributes establishing a BASE, the assertion raised
> most locally takes precedence.

The MHTML standard says that if there is both a Content-Base
and a Content-Location header in the same content heading, the
Content-Base has precedence over the Content-Location. Is there
any problem with this? Clearly, the standard must specify which
has precedence, good standard should not leave things like
this undefined. "undefined" in my opinion is an ugly word
in standards documents.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacob Palme <jpalme@dsv.su.se> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme