IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-14 review

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 19 October 2012 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4E921F8753 for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WMx5crhCe+UZ for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-sj.cisco.com (av-tac-sj.cisco.com [171.68.227.119]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E665B21F8748 for <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from fire.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-sj.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9JLD5YH028529; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.154.36.157] ([10.154.36.157]) by fire.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9JLD5a3005175; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5081C261.4020008@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:13:05 -0700
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@juniper.net>
References: <5081C15E.7010209@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5081C15E.7010209@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050300010103070108030302"
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-14 review
X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:13:06 -0000

> Dear all,
>
> Did one MIB doctor review this MIB module? Except Tom obviously ;-)
Answering my own question, thanks Dan for the MIB doctor review _on the 
top of the OPS-DIR review_.

Regards, Benoit
Reminder for Benoit: next time, look first in your OPS-DIR folder before 
sending emails!


> Tom, based on your MIB doctor experience, any controversial points in 
> the MIB module?
>
> Regards, Benoit.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email