Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-14 review

Hello,

I did reviews for versions 5, 6 and 7.     The comments on version 7 were
discussed on the list between the authors and myself.

Thanks,
-Joan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Benoit Claise'" <bclaise@cisco.com>; "'MIB Doctors (E-mail)'" 
<mib-doctors@ietf.org>; "'Thomas Nadeau'" <tnadeau@juniper.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-14 review

> Hello,
>
> The Ballot write-up says
>  Implementation status is unknown (as is often the case).
>  The document has been through many review cycles,
>  including review by a MIB Doctor and by the AD. Details
>  are on the WG list.
>
> Similar text shows in the shepherd write-up.
>
> Looking at the CCAMP mail archive, it looks like Joan did the review.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
>> Sent: 19 October 2012 22:09
>> To: MIB Doctors (E-mail); Thomas Nadeau
>> Cc: Adrian Farrel
>> Subject: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ted-mib-14 review
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Did one MIB doctor review this MIB module? Except Tom obviously ;-)
>> Tom, based on your MIB doctor experience, any controversial points in
>> the MIB module?
>>
>> Regards, Benoit.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
> MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors 